Pharmacodynamics of direct oral anticoagulants associated with post-endoscopic delayed mucosal resection bleeding of colorectal neoplasms
- PMID: 41429902
- PMCID: PMC12749976
- DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-33056-w
Pharmacodynamics of direct oral anticoagulants associated with post-endoscopic delayed mucosal resection bleeding of colorectal neoplasms
Abstract
Anticoagulant effects of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are influenced by their plasma levels and anti-factor Xa (FXa) activity. Delayed bleeding is a major adverse event associated with endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of colorectal neoplasms. However, the association between post-EMR bleeding and pharmacodynamics in patients taking DOAC remains unknown. This study investigated the association between pharmacological risk factors and delayed bleeding in patients receiving DOAC. This multicenter prospective trial in Japan evaluated the incidence of post-EMR delayed bleeding in DOAC users between April 2018 and May 2022 and determined the association of post-EMR delayed bleeding with plasma levels and FXa activity. The incidence of post-EMR delayed bleeding was 10.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.3%-18.0%). There were large individual differences in plasma levels and FXa activity for each DOAC. At the trough and Tmax, plasma DOAC levels and plasma level/dose ratios were significantly correlated with FXa activity. Multivariate analysis showed that high anticoagulant ability was a risk factor for post-EMR delayed bleeding (adjusted OR, 12.211; 95% CI: 1.081-137.922, p = 0.043). DOAC users with high anticoagulant activity may be at higher risk of post-EMR delayed bleeding from colorectal neoplasms.
Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-025-33056-w.
Keywords: Bleeding; Direct oral anticoagulant; Endoscopic mucosal resection; Pharmacokinetics; Polymorphism.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The study protocol conformed to the ethical guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Institutional Review Board of each institution (approved number in Tokyo Medical University: T2020-0025). Written informed consent was obtained from all patients. The registry number for this clinical trial was UMIN000042576 at the University Hospital Medical Information Network.
Figures
References
-
- Winawer, S. J. et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National polyp study workgroup. N Engl. J. Med.329, 1977–1981 (1993). - PubMed
-
- Sethi, A. & Song, L. M. Adverse events related to colonic endoscopic mucosal resection and polypectomy. Gastrointest. Endosc Clin. N Am.25, 55–69 (2015). - PubMed
-
- Nakajima, T. et al. Current status of endoscopic resection strategy for large, early colorectal neoplasia in Japan. Surg. Endosc. 27, 3262–3270 (2013). - PubMed
-
- Kobayashi, N. et al. Matched case-control study comparing endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal tumors. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol.27, 728–733 (2012). - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
