Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2025 Dec 22;30(1):41.
doi: 10.1186/s13054-025-05758-0.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of humoral immunity proteins and mortality in sepsis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Systematic review and meta-analysis of humoral immunity proteins and mortality in sepsis

Antoine Villa et al. Crit Care. .

Abstract

Purpose: Humoral immunity proteins-immunoglobulins, complement proteins, and antimicrobial peptides-have key antimicrobial and immunomodulatory functions in sepsis. We hypothesised that their circulating levels are lower in non-survivors, potentially resulting in impaired bacterial clearance and persistent or recurrent infections.

Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating differences in humoral immunity proteins between survivors and non-survivors in adult patients with sepsis. PubMed and Embase were searched without date restrictions. Random-effects meta-analyses were used to estimate pooled standardised mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Sensitivity analyses included data from the MIMIC-IV ICU database, and further supplemented by three proteomic studies.

Results: Thirty-six studies including 6,330 patients were analysed. Thirteen reported on immunoglobulins, 17 on complement proteins, and 7 on the antimicrobial peptide heparin-binding protein (HBP). Survivors had significantly higher levels of complement proteins C3 (SMD 0.53 [0.07-0.99]) and C4 (SMD 0.51 [0.09-0.94]) compared to non-survivors. Conversely, C4a (SMD - 1.17 [-1.77 to - 0.56]) and IgA (SMD - 0.21 [-0.39 to - 0.03]) were significantly lower in survivors. No differences were found for IgG (SMD 0.00 [-0.18 to 0.18]), IgM (SMD - 0.02 [-0.13 to 0.08]), C5, C5a, or HBP. Sensitivity analyses using MIMIC-IV (n = 2,452) and proteomic datasets supported these findings. Proteomic data revealed early depletion of classical complement components (C3, C4B) and regulatory proteins in non-survivors.

Conclusion: Sepsis non-survivors exhibit lower C3 and C4 levels and higher C4a, consistent with complement activation and/or depletion. Complement proteins may serve as potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets in sepsis.

Keywords: Complement; Humoral immunity; ICU; Immunoglobulins; Mortality; Sepsis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Not applicable. This study was a systematic review and meta-analysis based on previously published studies and de-identified, publicly available datasets (e.g., MIMIC-IV). For all included studies, the original investigators confirmed that appropriate ethical approvals and informed consent were obtained. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flowchart. Flowchart of included and excluded trials
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Meta-analysis of complement proteins in patients with sepsis. Forest plots comparing the levels of different complement proteins between survivors and non-survivors in the ICU. Each individual study is represented by a square, with its size proportional to the study's weight in the meta-analysis. Horizontal bars indicate 95% confidence intervals. The blue diamond represents the pooled effect estimate from the random-effects model. Heterogeneity values (I²) are provided for each analysis
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Meta-analysis of immunoglobulins in patients with sepsis. Forest plots comparing the levels of different immunoglobulin proteins between survivors and non-survivors in the ICU. Each individual study is represented by a square, with its size proportional to the study's weight in the meta-analysis. Horizontal bars indicate 95% confidence intervals. The blue diamond represents the pooled effect estimate from the random-effects model. Heterogeneity values (I²) are provided for each analysis

References

    1. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315:801–10. 10.1001/jama.2016.0287. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rudd KE, Johnson SC, Agesa KM, et al. Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990–2017: analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet. 2020;395:200–11. 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32989-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hotchkiss RS, Monneret G, Payen D. Sepsis-induced immunosuppression: from cellular dysfunctions to immunotherapy. Nat Rev Immunol. 2013;13:862–74. 10.1038/nri3552. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rubio I, Osuchowski MF, Shankar-Hari M, et al. Current gaps in sepsis immunology: new opportunities for translational research. Lancet Infect Dis. 2019;19:e422–36. 10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30567-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mantovani Alberto G. Humoral innate immunity and acute-phase proteins. N Engl J Med. 2023;388:439–52. 10.1056/NEJMra2206346. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources