Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2025 Dec 23;16(1):10124.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-66097-w.

Induction chemo-immunotherapy followed by chemo-radiotherapy and immunotherapy maintenance in stage III NSCLC (APOLO): a phase 2 trial

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Induction chemo-immunotherapy followed by chemo-radiotherapy and immunotherapy maintenance in stage III NSCLC (APOLO): a phase 2 trial

Mariano Provencio et al. Nat Commun. .

Abstract

Unresectable stage III NSCLC standard treatment is chemo-radiotherapy (CT-RT) followed by immunotherapy (IO) with durvalumab. We investigated adding an induction phase with chemo-immunotherapy (ChIO). APOLO was a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 trial (NCT04776447). Non-resectable stage IIIA-IIIC NSCLC patients received induction ChIO (atezolizumab + carboplatin + paclitaxel, for 3 cycles), followed by concurrent CT-RT (3 cycles), and IO maintenance (atezolizumab for 16 cycles). Primary objective was 12-month progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included 12- and 24-month overall survival (OS), ORR, first-site failure pattern, and safety. Exploratory endpoints included PD-L1, TMB, and ctDNA. 38 patients were enrolled. Median follow-up was 29.6 months (data cutoff, February 2024). PFS was 68.4% (95% CI, 51.1-80.7) at 12 months (statistically significant compared to null hypothesis of 55%) and 50.0% at 24 months; OS was 86.8% and 60.5%, respectively. After induction, 18 (47.4%) had partial response, 14 (36.8%) stable disease, and 5 (13.2%) progressive disease. Overall, 18 patients had disease progression: 8 local (44.4%) and 10 distant (55.6%). Grade ≥3 TRAEs occurred in 11 (28.9%) during induction, 10 (26.3%) during CT-RT, and 2 (5.3%) during maintenance. ChIO induction before CT-RT and IO maintenance showed activity and safety, warranting confirmation in larger studies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: M.P. reports grants, consulting fees and non-financial support from BMS; grants, consulting fees and non-financial support from Roche; grants, consulting fees and non-financial support from Astra Zeneca; consulting fees from MSD; consulting fees from Takeda; outside the submitted work. B.C. reports payment or honoraria from BMS, Astra Zeneca, Novartis, Amgen; support for attending meetings or travels from Roche, Astra Zeneca, GSK, Lilly; and advisory board from Roche and Astra Zeneca. R.G.-C. reports payment or honoraria from AstraZeneca, BMS, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, and Takeda; support for attending meetings or travel from AstraZeneca, Roche, Pfizer, BMS, MSD, and Janssen; and advisory board participation with AstraZeneca and Janssen. M.D. reports payment or honoraria from Janssen, Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, MSD, Guardant; support for attending meetings or travels from Janssen; advisory Board participation with Bristol Myers Squibb. S.V-E. reports consulting fees from AstraZeneca; payment or honoraria from AstraZeneca; support for attending meetings or travels from AstraZeneca. A.F. reports payment or honoraria from AstraZeneca; support for attending meetings or travels from Merck, MSD, Pfizer. A.B. reports consulting fees from AZ; payment Honoraria from Regeneron; support for attending meetings or travels from Roche Pharma. A.I. reports payment or honoraria from Amgen, BMS, Regeneron, Roche, Takeda; support for attending meetings or travel: Roche, Pfizer, MSD, Takeda; and advisory board participation with AstraZeneca, Roche, Pfizer, Takeda. M.C-A. reports payment or honoraria: Roche, Bristol, MSD, AstraZeneca, Janssen, Pfizer, Takeda, Regeneron; support for attending meetings and/or travel: Roche, Bristol, MSD, AstraZeneca, Janssen, Pfizer, Takeda, Regeneron. R.L. reports payment or honoraria from Takeda, AstraZeneca, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche, Pierre-Fabre; support for attending meetings or travel from Roche, AstraZeneca, MSD, Takeda, Merck Serono. V.C. reports consulting fees from Roche, AstraZeneca, MSD, BMS, Takeda, Sanofi, Amgen, GSK, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen; payment or honoraria from Roche, AstraZeneca, MSD, BMS, Takeda, Sanofi, Amgen, Pfizer, Janssen, Beigene; support for attending meetings or travels: AstraZeneca, Roche, MSD, Takeda, Janssen. D.R-A. reports honoraria for lectures from MSD, Roche, BMS, Novartis, Takeda, Lilly, AstraZeneca. Support for attending meetings or travels from Roche, MSD, Novartis, Sanofi; advisory board participation with Merck Sharp Dohme, Regeneron, BMS, GSK, Lilly. J.B-B. reports consulting fees from Roche; payment or honoraria from BMS, Roche, AstraZeneca, Regeneron, MSD, Pfizer, Amgen; support for attending meetings or travels from MSD, Roche, Takeda. A.L-M. reports payment or honoraria from Pfizer, Lilly, Novartis; support for attending meetings or travels from MSD, AMGEM, Takeda; support for attending meetings or travels from MSD, Roche, Takeda. A.R. reports grants from EMQN; consulting fees from Johnson and Johnson, ThermoFisher; payment or honoraria from Illumina, Health in Code, ThermoFisher; support for attending meetings or travels from ThermoFisher, Bristol Myers Squibb; and Advisory Board participation with Takeda. All other authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Survival analyses of intention-to-treat population.
A Progression-free Survival in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. B Overall Survival in the intention-to-treat population (ITT). Shaded areas represent the 95% confidence interval. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Post-hoc survival analyses of intention-to-treat population.
A Progression-free Survival (PFS) after induction treatment by Overall Response Rate (ORR) in the intention-to-treat population. PR partial response, SD stable disease, PD progression disease. B Progression-free Survival “PACIFIC-related” in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. Shaded areas represent the 95% confidence interval. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

References

    1. Aupérin, A. et al. Meta-analysis of concomitant versus sequential radiochemotherapy in locally advanced non - small-cell lung cancer. J. Clin. Oncol.28, 2181–2190 (2010). - PubMed
    1. Schaake-Koning, C. et al. Effects of concomitant cisplatin and radiotherapy on inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer. N. Engl. J. Med.326, 524–30 (1992). - PubMed
    1. Jeremic, B., Shibamoto, Y., Acimovic, L. & Djuric, L. Randomized trial of hyperfractionated radiation therapy with or without concurrent chemotherapy for stage III non-small-cell lung cancer. J. Clin. Oncol.13, 452–458 (1995). - PubMed
    1. Antonia, S. J. et al. Durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy in stage III non–small-cell lung cancer. N. Engl. J. Med.377, 1919–1929 (2017). - PubMed
    1. Zhou, Q. et al. Sugemalimab versus placebo after concurrent or sequential chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced, unresectable, stage III non-small-cell lung cancer in China (GEMSTONE-301): interim results of a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol.23, 209–219 (2022). - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms