Impact of surgical non-technical skills on clinical outcomes: systematic review
- PMID: 41459916
- PMCID: PMC12746291
- DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znaf271
Impact of surgical non-technical skills on clinical outcomes: systematic review
Abstract
Background: Deficiencies in non-technical skills (NTS) such as leadership and communication can lead to intraoperative inefficiency and error. However, the relationship between these skills and patient-level outcomes has yet to be synthesized. The aim of this study was to systematically review the evidence examining the relationship between intraoperative NTS and clinical outcomes.
Methods: The PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL, and PsycINFO databases were searched for relevant studies published between inception and 1 November 2024. Eligible studies assessed NTS of operating room personnel, were conducted in non-simulated environments, and reported clinical outcomes. NTS were categorized into five core domains including leadership and communication. Patient-level outcomes comprised eight clinical measures including mortality and postoperative complications.
Results: Of 6313 screened studies, 21 met the inclusion criteria. Included studies represented 8536 participants performing 251 180 procedures across 13 specialties. Eleven observational studies assessed NTS of surgical personnel via study participants or observers. Ten interventional studies introduced NTS team training initiatives. Twelve of 21 studies (57%) incorporating 247 036 of all procedures (98.4%) reported significant improvements in clinical outcomes. Nine of 11 observational studies (82%) reported significant improvement in clinical outcomes compared with 3 of 10 interventional studies (30%). No studies demonstrated a significant deterioration in clinical outcomes associated with improved NTS.
Conclusion: Published evidence shows a significant link between intraoperative NTS and patient-level outcomes. These findings reinforce the value of behavioural assessment in surgery, support evidence-based team training, and underscore the need to embed NTS into regulatory frameworks to improve surgical quality and safety worldwide.
© The Author(s) 2025. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Foundation Ltd. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.
References
-
- Anderson O, Davis R, Hanna GB, Vincent CA. Surgical adverse events: a systematic review. Am J Surg 2013;206:253–262 - PubMed
-
- Gawande AA, Zinner MJ, Studdert DM, Brennan TA. Analysis of errors reported by surgeons at three teaching hospitals. Surgery 2003;133:614–621 - PubMed
-
- Greenberg CC, Regenbogen SE, Studdert DM, Lipsitz SR, Rogers SO, Zinner MJ et al. Patterns of communication breakdowns resulting in injury to surgical patients. J Am Coll Surg 2007;204:533–540 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
