Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Dec 30;25(1):609.
doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-03344-3.

Uniportal thoracoscopic and single-incision plus one port laparoscopic esophagectomy with direct vision retrosternal reconstruction for esophageal cancer a single center retrospective cohort study

Affiliations

Uniportal thoracoscopic and single-incision plus one port laparoscopic esophagectomy with direct vision retrosternal reconstruction for esophageal cancer a single center retrospective cohort study

Ruirong Lin et al. BMC Surg. .

Abstract

Introduction: Despite being highly invasive, esophagectomy remains the mainstay of treatment for early- and intermediate-stage esophageal cancer. With the advancement of minimally invasive techniques, single-port thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy has been increasingly applied in clinical practice, offering advantages in terms of improved cosmetic outcomes, reduced postoperative pain, and enhanced recovery. However, the procedure is technically demanding. In addition, the traditional posterior mediastinal route for reconstruction is associated with a relatively high risk of complications, whereas reconstruction via the substernal route may significantly reduce cardiopulmonary morbidity.

Objective: To evaluate the short-term outcomes of uniportal thoracoscopic and single-incision plus one port laparoscopic minimally invasive esophagectomy combined with direct retrosternal approach for radical esophagectomy.

Methods and analysis: The clinical data of 60 patients who underwent uniportal thoracoscopic and single-incision plus one port laparoscopic minimally invasive esophagectomy combined with direct retrosternal approach for radical esophagectomy between January 2024 and February 2025 were retrospectively analyzed. Perioperative indicators and postoperative follow-up data were recorded in detail.

Results: All surgeries were successfully completed with no conversion to open thoracotomy or laparotomy, and no perioperative deaths occurred. The mean operative time was 209.35 ± 28.57 min, the mean intraoperative blood loss was 64.17 ± 20.53 mL, and the mean number of lymph nodes dissected was 32.35 ± 11.51. The visual analog scale (VAS) scores for pain at postoperative were 2.20 ± 0.99. The average length of hospital stay was 7.92 ± 2.11 days. Ten patients developed postoperative complications, with a complication rate of 16.67%.

Conclusion: Uniportal thoracoscopic and single-incision plus one port laparoscopic minimally invasive esophagectomy combined with direct retrosternal approach is a safe and feasible technique for esophageal cancer, with potential advantages in terms of cosmetic outcomes and reduced postoperative incisional pain.

Keywords: Esophageal cancer; Radical esophagectomy; Retrosternal approach; Single-incision; Thoracoabdominal laparoscopy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Fujian Cancer Hospital (SQ2024-018) and study was conducted under the guidance of the Declaration of Helsinki. All participants signed a written informed consent form. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Thoracic incision
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The mediastinal pleura was incised at the pleural apex
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Dissection of the lymph nodes adjacent to the right recurrent laryngeal nerve
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
The posterior wall of the esophagus was mobilized with preservation of the thoracic duct
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Dissection of the lymph nodes located beneath the azygos arch
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
The esophagus was transected
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
The left recurrent laryngeal nerve was identified and carefully preserved
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
The middle and lower esophagus was mobilized down to the esophageal hiatus
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
Abdominal incision
Fig. 10
Fig. 10
Liver retraction technique (1)
Fig. 11
Fig. 11
Liver retraction technique (2)
Fig. 12
Fig. 12
Liver retraction technique (3)
Fig. 13
Fig. 13
The right gastroepiploic vascular arch was preserved
Fig. 14
Fig. 14
Lymphadenectomy was performed along the left gastric artery, splenic artery, and common hepatic artery
Fig. 15
Fig. 15
The esophageal stump was exteriorized
Fig. 16
Fig. 16
The inferior pole of the spleen was mobilized
Fig. 17
Fig. 17
The retrosternal tunnel was created under direct vision
Fig. 18
Fig. 18
The tubularized stomach was elevated under direct vision

References

    1. Takeuchi H, Miyata H, Gotoh M, et al. A risk model for esophagectomy using data of 5354 patients included in a Japanese nationwide web-based database. Ann Surg. 2014;260(2):259–66. - PubMed
    1. Tachimori Y, Ozawa S, Numasaki H, et al. Efficacy of lymph node dissection by node zones according to tumor location for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Esophagus. 2016;13:1–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gonzalez-Rivas D. VATS lobectomy: surgical evolution from conventional VATS to uniportal approach. Sci World J. 2012;2012(1):780842. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lee JM, Chen SC, Yang SM, et al. Comparison of single-and multi-incision minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for treating esophageal cancer: a propensity-matched study. Surg Endosc. 2017;31:2925–31. - PubMed
    1. Booka E. What is the best reconstruction procedure after esophagectomy? A meta-analysis comparing posterior mediastinal and retrosternal approaches. Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2023;7(4):553–64. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources