Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Dec 12;13(12):3073.
doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13123073.

Liquid Biopsy and Multi-Omic Biomarkers in Breast Cancer: Innovations in Early Detection, Therapy Guidance, and Disease Monitoring

Affiliations
Review

Liquid Biopsy and Multi-Omic Biomarkers in Breast Cancer: Innovations in Early Detection, Therapy Guidance, and Disease Monitoring

Daniel Simancas-Racines et al. Biomedicines. .

Abstract

Liquid biopsy and multi-omic biomarker integration are transforming precision oncology in breast cancer, providing real-time, minimally invasive insights into tumor biology. By analyzing circulating tumor DNA, circulating tumor cells, exosomal non-coding RNAs, and proteomic or metabolomic profiles, clinicians can monitor clonal evolution, therapeutic response, and recurrence risk in real time. Recent advances in sequencing technologies, methylation profiling, and artificial intelligence-driven data integration have markedly improved diagnostic sensitivity and predictive accuracy. Multi-omic frameworks combining genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic data enable early detection of resistance, molecular stratification, and identification of actionable targets, while machine learning models enhance outcome prediction and therapy optimization. Despite these advances, key challenges persist. Pre-analytical variability, lack of standardized protocols, and disparities in access continue to limit reproducibility and clinical adoption. High costs, incomplete regulatory validation, and the absence of definitive evidence for mortality reduction underscore the need for larger, prospective trials. Integrating multi-omic assays into clinical workflows will require robust bioinformatics pipelines, clinician-friendly reporting systems, and interdisciplinary collaboration among molecular scientists, data engineers, and oncologists. In the near future, liquid biopsy is expected to complement, not replace, traditional tissue analysis, serving as a cornerstone of adaptive cancer management. As sequencing becomes faster and more affordable, multi-omic and AI-driven analyses will allow earlier detection, more precise treatment adjustments, and continuous monitoring across the disease course. Ultimately, these innovations herald a shift toward real-time, data-driven oncology that personalizes breast cancer care and improves patient outcomes.

Keywords: breast cancer; healthcare; liquid biopsy; multi-omic biomarkers; precision medicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Integrated role of liquid biopsy across diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up in breast cancer. During diagnosis and early detection, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), cell-free DNA (cfDNA), and exosomal microRNAs enable early molecular identification of mutations and methylation changes that may precede imaging findings. In the treatment phase, quantitative ctDNA monitoring reflects therapeutic response and minimal residual disease, while circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and exosomal long non-coding RNAs provide insights into receptor discordance, epithelial–mesenchymal transition, and immune modulation. For follow-up and relapse surveillance, the reappearance of ESR1 or TP53 mutations and persistent CTCs serve as early indicators of recurrence or micrometastatic disease. Multi-omic integration and AI-based analytical tools further enhance the predictive accuracy of these biomarkers, supporting personalized and adaptive management strategies in breast cancer [37,39,84].

References

    1. Allahqoli L., Mazidimoradi A., Momenimovahed Z., Rahmani A., Hakimi S., Tiznobaik A., Gharacheh M., Salehiniya H., Babaey F., Alkatout I. The Global Incidence, Mortality, and Burden of Breast Cancer in 2019: Correlation With Smoking, Drinking, and Drug Use. Front. Oncol. 2022;12:921015. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.921015. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arnold M., Morgan E., Rumgay H., Mafra A., Singh D., Laversanne M., Vignat J., Gralow J.R., Cardoso F., Siesling S., et al. Current and future burden of breast cancer: Global statistics for 2020 and 2040. Breast. 2022;66:15–23. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2022.08.010. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sung H., Ferlay J., Siegel R.L., Laversanne M., Soerjomataram I., Jemal A., Bray F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2021;71:209–249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Giaquinto A.N., Sung H., Miller K.D., Kramer J.L., Newman L.A., Minihan A., Jemal A., Siegel R.L. Breast Cancer Statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2022;72:524–541. doi: 10.3322/caac.21754. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Giaquinto A.N., Sung H., Newman L.A., Freedman R.A., Smith R.A., Star J., Jemal A., Siegel R.L. Breast cancer statistics 2024. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2024;74:477–495. doi: 10.3322/caac.21863. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources