Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Dec 5;15(12):1700.
doi: 10.3390/biom15121700.

Biofunctionalization of Stem Cell Scaffold for Osteogenesis and Bone Regeneration

Affiliations
Review

Biofunctionalization of Stem Cell Scaffold for Osteogenesis and Bone Regeneration

Qianqian Chen et al. Biomolecules. .

Abstract

Repairing bone defects resulting from trauma, tumor resection, or pathological conditions remains a significant clinical challenge. While conventional bone grafting techniques are constrained by inherent limitations, stem cell-based tissue engineering scaffolds offer a promising therapeutic alternative. The ideal scaffold should not only serve as a structural support but, more importantly, must establish a bioactive microenvironment capable of directing stem cell osteogenic differentiation. Consequently, scaffold biofunctionalization has emerged as a fundamental strategy for achieving effective bone regeneration. This review comprehensively examines the primary materials utilized in bone regeneration scaffolds and systematically analyzes key biofunctionalization approaches, including surface modification, incorporation of bioactive molecules, and integration of functional ions. Moreover, it thoroughly discusses the mechanisms through which biofunctionalized scaffolds modulate stem cell behavior and enhance bone repair in vivo. Finally, the article provides insights into future research directions and emerging trends, aiming to inform the rational design and development of advanced bone regeneration scaffolds.

Keywords: biofunctionalization; bone regeneration; scaffold; stem cell; visualization research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 3
Figure 3
Research Findings Related to Peptide Segment and Nucleic Acid Aptamer Modifications. (A) Double staining with Runx2 and OPN immunofluorescence in hMSCs cultured on skeletal tissue for 14 days [112]. (B) Reconstructed micro-CT images of bone samples cultured on skeletal tissue [112]. The dashed red circles indicate the original extent of the critical-sized calvarial defect. (C) Representative images of crystal violet-stained migrating cells [115]. (D) Representative images of SO/FG staining after various treatments over 3 weeks. Scale bar: 250 μm, n = 5 per group [115]. (E) Representative images of alizarin red S staining for mineral deposits in BMSCs in bone-like medium. Scale bar: 200 μm, n = 3 per group [115].
Figure 1
Figure 1
Mechanisms of MSC-mediated bone regeneration. MSCs promote bone repair through osteogenic differentiation, paracrine secretion of bioactive factors, and immunomodulation that will be beneficial for regeneration. Created with BioRender.com.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Classification of scaffold materials. The outer ring indicates the material sources, with each sector representing a category and containing the corresponding materials. Created with BioRender.com.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Global Literature Trend. (A) Annual publication volume and cumulative publication volume globally in this field. (B) Top 10 countries or regions in terms of total citations in the field. (C) The percentage of publications by country in this field. (D) Top 10 countries and regions in terms of H-index in the field of mesenchymal stem cell therapy for bone regeneration.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Bibliometric Analysis of Cooperation Among Authors, Countries, and Institutions. (A) Mapping of the identified authors in this field based on VOSviewer. (B) National collaboration analysis and (C) Institutional collaboration analysis in this field.

References

    1. Bharadwaz A., Jayasuriya A.C. Recent trends in the application of widely used natural and synthetic polymer nanocomposites in bone tissue regeneration. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2020;110:110698. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2020.110698. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Florencio-Silva R., Sasso G.R., Sasso-Cerri E., Simoes M.J., Cerri P.S. Biology of Bone Tissue: Structure, Function, and Factors That Influence Bone Cells. Biomed. Res. Int. 2015;2015:421746. doi: 10.1155/2015/421746. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pittenger M.F., Discher D.E., Peault B.M., Phinney D.G., Hare J.M., Caplan A.I. Mesenchymal stem cell perspective: Cell biology to clinical progress. NPJ Regen. Med. 2019;4:22. doi: 10.1038/s41536-019-0083-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ho-Shui-Ling A., Bolander J., Rustom L.E., Johnson A.W., Luyten F.P., Picart C. Bone regeneration strategies: Engineered scaffolds, bioactive molecules and stem cells current stage and future perspectives. Biomaterials. 2018;180:143–162. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.07.017. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Todd E.A., Mirsky N.A., Silva B.L.G., Shinde A.R., Arakelians A.R.L., Nayak V.V., Marcantonio R.A.C., Gupta N., Witek L., Coelho P.G. Functional Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Regeneration: A Comprehensive Review of Materials, Methods, and Future Directions. J. Funct. Biomater. 2024;15:280. doi: 10.3390/jfb15100280. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources