Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Organ Donation: A Modified Delphi Study Exploring Cumulative Impact Index Feasibility
- PMID: 41474614
- DOI: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000002640
Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Organ Donation: A Modified Delphi Study Exploring Cumulative Impact Index Feasibility
Abstract
Although the goal of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) remains survival with meaningful neurologic recovery, secondary contribution to organ donation is increasingly recognized. We identified standardized outcome metrics for quality improvement and reporting and explored the feasibility of developing an ECPR Cumulative Impact Index. Fourteen international ECPR experts completed a modified Delphi process to achieve these aims. Qualitative analysis of free-text responses further informed framework development. Consensus was not reached on a unified scoring index. However, participants endorsed several reporting domains with greater than 75% agreement, including cerebral performance categorization and modified Rankin score with organ donation as outcomes, and specific metric tracking pertaining to organ donation. Similarly, there was greater than 75% agreement not to stratify organ donation into neurological versus circulatory determination of death. Qualitative analysis explored five themes: death without donation, non-neurologically intact survival, organ donation benefit, score implementation, and ethical principles. Particular emphasis was placed on avoiding incentivization of cannulation solely for organ donation and understanding that the lived patient and family experience cannot be so simply summarized through numeric quantification. Ultimately, the panel agreed that while a unified ECPR beneficence score remains elusive, consensus-based outcome metrics offer a practical and ethically grounded framework for program evaluation.
Keywords: ECPR; OHCA survival; organ donation.
Copyright © ASAIO 2025.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosure: D.M. is a consultant for Cook Medical, Atricure, and Elucent. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to report.
References
-
- Abrams D, MacLaren G, Lorusso R, et al.: Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in adults: Evidence and implications. Intensive Care Med 48: 1–15, 2022.
-
- Yannopoulos D, Bartos J, Raveendran G, et al.: Advanced reperfusion strategies for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and refractory ventricular fibrillation (ARREST): A phase 2, single centre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 396: 1807–1816, 2020.
-
- Belohlavek J, Smalcova J, Rob D, et al.; Prague OHCA Study Group: Effect of intra-arrest transport, extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and immediate invasive assessment and treatment on functional neurologic outcome in refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA 327: 737–747, 2022.
-
- Yannopoulos D, Bartos JA, Aufderheide TP, et al.; American Heart Association Emergency Cardiovascular Care Committee: The evolving role of the cardiac catheterization laboratory in the management of patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 139: e530–e552, 2019.
-
- Yannopoulos D, Bartos JA, Raveendran G, et al.: Coronary artery disease in patients with out-of-hospital refractory ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest. J Am Coll Cardiol 70: 1109–1117, 2017.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
