Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2025 Dec 16:16:1690915.
doi: 10.3389/fphys.2025.1690915. eCollection 2025.

Cardiac and vascular autonomic control in patients with hereditary angioedema

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Cardiac and vascular autonomic control in patients with hereditary angioedema

Beatrice De Maria et al. Front Physiol. .

Abstract

Background: Regulation of vascular permeability in hereditary angioedema due to C1 inhibitor deficiency (HAE-C1INH) is key to understanding the disease, but the role of the autonomic nervous system (ANS) in this mechanism remains unclear.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the cardiovascular autonomic response to the head-up tilt test (HUTT) in HAE-C1INH patients and matched healthy controls (HCs).

Methods: HAE-C1INH patients were evaluated during a 1-week symptom-free period. Electrocardiogram (ECG) and beat-to-beat non-invasive arterial blood pressure (BP) were recorded in the supine position (REST) and during 70° tilt (TILT). Heart rate and systolic BP (SBP) variability indices were derived. Variance (σ2 SBP) and low-frequency power (LFSBP) of SBP variability were used as markers of sympathetic vascular control.

Results: Twenty-five HAE-C1INH patients [13 male individuals, 44 (28.8-57.5) years] and 25 HCs [13 male individuals, 44 (30.8-54.3) years] were enrolled and divided into <45 and ≥45 age groups. Eighteen patients were on long-term prophylaxis (LTP). In the younger group, LFSBP increased from REST to TILT in both groups, with no differences. In older subjects, HAE-C1INH patients showed higher σ2 SBP [21.2 (9.3-59.2) vs. 7.5 (1.9-14.6) mmHg2] and a greater LFSBP increase [9.4 (4.6-22.4) vs. 0.9 (0.2-7.6) mmHg2] than HCs during TILT, suggesting sympathetic hyperactivation. No significant group differences in cardiac autonomic control were observed during REST or TILT, regardless of age. Findings in the LTP subgroup mirrored those of the full cohort.

Conclusion: Older HAE-C1INH patients display altered vascular autonomic regulation, with an exaggerated sympathetic response during orthostatic stress. Further studies are needed to assess the role of LTP in these alterations.

Clinical trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06408805?cond=Hereditary%20Angioedema&term=autonomic&rank=1.

Keywords: autonomic nervous system; heart rate variability; hereditary angioedema; long-term prophylaxis; rare disease; secondary prevention; systolic arterial pressure variability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The authors declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Flowchart of the enrolled population. Legend: HAE, hereditary angioedema.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Comparison of the cardiovascular neural control indices in HAE patients and HCs during HUTT. Boxplots show µRR (a), σ2 RR (b), HFRR (c), µSBP (d), σ2 SBP (e), and LFSBP (f) in HAE patients (dark gray boxes) and HCs (white boxes) during REST and TILT. Data are presented as the median [IQR]. *p < 0.05 REST vs. TILT, #p < 0.05 HAE patients vs. HCs, based on two-way analysis of variance with Holm–Sidak post hoc test.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Comparison of the vascular neural control indices in HAE patients and HCs who were younger and older than 45 years during HUTT. Line plots show σ2 SBP and LFSBP of HAE patients and their age- and sex-matched HCs who were younger (left) and older (right) than 45 years *p < 0.05 REST vs. TILT, #p < 0.05 HAE patients vs. HCs, based on two-way analysis of variance with Holm–Sidak post hoc test.

References

    1. Accardo A., Merlo M., Silveri G., Del Popolo L., Dalla Libera L., Restivo L., et al. (2021). Influence of ageing on circadian rhythm of heart rate variability in healthy subjects. J. Cardiovasc Med. Hagerst. 22, 405–413. 10.2459/JCM.0000000000001048 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Akaike H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans. Autom. Contr 19, 716–723. 10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705 - DOI
    1. Akselrod S., Gordon D., Ubel F. A., Shannon D. C., Berger A. C., Cohen R. J. (1981). Power spectrum analysis of heart rate fluctuation: a quantitative probe of beat-to-beat cardiovascular control. Science 213, 220–222. 10.1126/science.6166045 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Altini M., Plews D. (2021). What is behind changes in resting heart rate and heart rate variability? A large-scale analysis of longitudinal measurements acquired in free-living. Sensors 21, 7932. 10.3390/s21237932 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barnett S. R., Morin R. J., Kiely D. K., Gagnon M., Azhar G., Knight E. L., et al. (1999). Effects of age and gender on autonomic control of blood pressure dynamics. Hypertension 33, 1195–1200. 10.1161/01.HYP.33.5.1195 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources