Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Dec 26;17(12):111468.
doi: 10.4330/wjc.v17.i12.111468.

Coronary drug-coated balloons: Current evidence and emerging trends

Affiliations
Review

Coronary drug-coated balloons: Current evidence and emerging trends

Monika Bhandari et al. World J Cardiol. .

Abstract

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for coronary and peripheral stenoses has advanced rapidly over the past three decades, driven by a series of innovative techniques since the introduction of the first balloon angioplasty. Significant progress in stent technology, beginning with bare-metal stents and followed by drug-eluting stents, has expanded the scope for successful revascularisation in complex lesions. However, challenges such as late stent thrombosis and in-stent restenosis (ISR) persist. Thus, further improvement in PCI techniques and devices is essential to achieve better patient outcomes. In recent years, drug-coated balloons (DCBs) have emerged as a promising alternative designed to overcome the limitations associated with drug-eluting stents, including the risks of late stent thrombosis, ISR, and the need for prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy. Several DCBs have been evaluated for both coronary and peripheral lesions, showing encouraging results in preclinical and clinical studies. DCBs have demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of ISR and have shown potential in other clinical scenarios, such as small-vessel disease and diffuse lesions. In this review, we present the underlying technology, mechanisms of action, key preclinical findings, emerging clinical indications, recent trial outcomes, and future perspectives of DCBs as they continue to define their role in PCI.

Keywords: Clinical trials; Paclitaxel; Percutaneous coronary interventions; Restenosis; Small vessel disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Journey of various trials of sirolimus and paclitaxel drug-coated balloons in clinical practice. The blue color represents the paclitaxel drug, and green represents sirolimus. The names inside the balloon refer to commercially available drug-coated balloon (DCB), while the boxes represent the names of trials. It can be seen that initially all trials were done with paclitaxel-eluting DCBs, but of late studies have evaluated sirolimus DCBs.

References

    1. Murphy E, Rahimtoola SH. Transluminal dilatation for coronary-artery stenosis. Lancet. 1978;1:1093. - PubMed
    1. Canfield J, Totary-Jain H. 40 Years of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: History and Future Directions. J Pers Med. 2018;8:33. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Grech ED. ABC of interventional cardiology: percutaneous coronary intervention. I: history and development. BMJ. 2003;326:1080–1082. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fischman DL, Leon MB, Baim DS, Schatz RA, Savage MP, Penn I, Detre K, Veltri L, Ricci D, Nobuyoshi M. A randomized comparison of coronary-stent placement and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of coronary artery disease. Stent Restenosis Study Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:496–501. - PubMed
    1. Serruys PW, de Jaegere P, Kiemeneij F, Macaya C, Rutsch W, Heyndrickx G, Emanuelsson H, Marco J, Legrand V, Materne P. A comparison of balloon-expandable-stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. Benestent Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:489–495. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources