Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2026 Mar 15:263:14-21.
doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.11.019. Epub 2025 Dec 31.

The Impact of Atherectomy in Severely Calcified Lesions in Impella-Supported High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

The Impact of Atherectomy in Severely Calcified Lesions in Impella-Supported High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Batlah Falah et al. Am J Cardiol. .

Abstract

Severe coronary artery calcification (CAC) complicates high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (HRPCI), particularly in patients with impaired left ventricular function. Atherectomy may facilitate lesion preparation, but its use in high-risk settings is limited. We therefore aimed to assess the impact of CAC severity and atherectomy on outcomes in Impella-supported HRPCI. In the PROTECT III study (NCT04136392), 1,015 of 1,237 patients had data on CAC severity and atherectomy. Patients were grouped as severe CAC without atherectomy (n = 298), severe CAC with atherectomy (n = 326), and no severe CAC (n = 400). The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE: all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke/TIA, or repeat revascularization) at 30- and 90-days. Secondary endpoints included 1-year mortality, PCI-related complications, and hemodynamic instability. Patients with severe CAC had higher baseline SYNTAX scores and more left main disease. Atherectomy was associated with slightly longer procedural times, but not increased periprocedural complications or hemodynamic instability. At 90 days, MACCE was highest in the untreated severe CAC group (16.1% vs 12.6% vs 9.2%; overall log-rank p = 0.048). One-year mortality was also highest in this group (23.7%; p = 0.02). However, CAC severity and atherectomy use were not independent predictors of outcomes. Sensitivity analysis excluding patients with atherectomy but no severe CAC showed higher mortality risk in untreated severe CAC cases (adjHR: 0.59; overall p = 0.026). In conclusion, Severe CAC is common in patients undergoing Impella-supported HRPCI and is associated with worse outcomes. Atherectomy was safe but its benefit remains uncertain. These findings highlight the prognostic relevance of CAC and the potential role of calcium modification in HRPCI.

Keywords: PROTECT III; atherectomy; coronary artery calcification; high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention; major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of competing interest M.B. Basir has served as a consultant for Abbott Vascular, Abiomed, Boston Scientific, Cardiovascular Systems, Chiesi, Saranas. and Zoll. B. Redfors reports consultant fees from Pfizer and Boehringer Ingelheim. W.W. O’Neil reports grant/research support from St. Jude Medical, Edwards Lifesciences, and Biomed; consulting fees/honoraria from Medtronic and Abiomed; and major stock shareholder/equity in Synecor, Accumed, Neovasc, Tendyne, and Mitral Align. J. Wollmuth reports consulting fees/honoraria from Abbott Vascular, Abiomed, Boston Scientific, and Shockwave Medical. All other coauthors have no relevant financial disclosures.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources