Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2026 Jan 20;7(1):102533.
doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2025.102533. Epub 2026 Jan 2.

A randomized controlled trial of precision bezlotoxumab treatment for Clostridioides difficile infection

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

A randomized controlled trial of precision bezlotoxumab treatment for Clostridioides difficile infection

Christos Psarrakis et al. Cell Rep Med. .

Abstract

Early risk recognition for organ dysfunction and death by Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is an unmet need. A prediction score is developed in the BEYOND study (ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT02573571, NCT04725123, and NCT05304715). At the first stage, using 153 patients and 150 comparators, the BEYOND score was developed integrating hemoglobin; blood urea; blood interleukin-8; carriage of G alleles of rs2091172; and presence of Terrisporobacter glycolicus, Enterococcus avium, and Anaerovorax odorimutans in the stool. The score had 84.6% sensitivity and 95.8% specificity for unfavorable outcomes. At the second stage, a double-blind randomized controlled trial was performed, and 44 patients at high-risk by BEYOND score were treated with standard-of-care plus Bezlotoxumab or placebo. The primary endpoint was the incidence of organ dysfunction, CDI relapse, and/or death. This endpoint was met in 72.7% of patients in the placebo arm and 31.8% in the Bezlotoxumab arm (p = 0.015). Results suggest that BEYOND score can detect early risk in patients with CDI.

Keywords: Clostridioides difficile; bezlotoxumab; microbiome; single-nucleotide polymorphisms.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of interests K.A. reports receiving honoraria and consulting fees from healthcare companies, including MSD, Pfizer, 3M Hellas, GSK/ViiV and Gilead. H.M. reports receiving honoraria, consulting fees, and non-financial support from healthcare companies, including Amgen, Angelini, Bayer, Mylan, MSD, Pfizer, and Servier. G.P. has received honoraria and/or consulting fees by Astra-Zeneca, Gilead, GSK, Menarini, MSD, Norma, Pfizer, and SOBI and research grants by the University of Minnesota/University College London, the Hellenic Institute for the Study of Sepsis, Bausch, Roche, Xenothera, FabNTech, and Pfizer. M.G.N. is a scientific founder of TTxD, Biotrip, and Lemba and was supported by an ERC Advanced Grant (#833247) and a Spinoza grant of the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research. E.J.G.-B. has received honoraria from Abbott Products Operations, bioMérieux, GSK, UCB, Sobi AB, and Thermo Fisher Brahms GmbH; independent educational grants from Abbott Products Operations, AbbVie, bioMérieux Inc., Johnson & Johnson, InCyte, MSD, Novartis, UCB, Sanofi, and Sobi; the Horizon 2020 European Grants ImmunoSep and RISCinCOVID; and the Horizon Health grants EPIC-CROWN-2, POINT, and Homi-Lung (granted to the Hellenic Institute for the Study of Sepsis).

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
Figure 1
Figure 1
Suggestive SNPs of susceptibility for CDI (A) Manhattan plot presenting the p values of comparisons of SNPs between patients (n = 134) and comparators (n = 134). The cutoffs of statistical significance (red line) and suggestive significance (blue line) are provided. (B) Final step of the stepwise logistic regression procedure with group (comparators vs. CDI) as the dependent variable; odds ratios less than 1 indicate protective alleles. Abbreviations: CDI, Clostridioides difficile infection; CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio; SNP, single-nucleotide polymorphism.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Development of the BEYOND score to predict the risk of progression into unfavorable outcomes within the first 40 days from the onset of infection by Clostridioides difficile (A) Stepwise logistic regression analysis that identifies four independent host variables associated with unfavorable outcome by CDI. (B) Stepwise logistic regression analysis that identifies three bacterial species in the stool that are independently associated with unfavorable outcomes by CDI. (C) Calculation of the BEYOND score. The score is calculated in two steps. At the first step, the presence of the host variables provides individual points per variable. If the sum is more than 9, then the patient is called high-risk for unfavorable outcome. If the first step is negative (i.e., sum ≤9), RT-PCR should run for three bacterial species, and the presence of each species provides separate points. If the sum is more than −3.5, then the patient is called high-risk. If this is less than or equal to −3.5, the patients is called low-risk. (D) Total prognostic performance of the BEYOND score for unfavorable CI outcome. Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; n. number of patients; OR; odds ratio; NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value; RT-PCR, real-time PCR.
Figure 3
Figure 3
BEYOND trial flow chart Abbreviations: ITT, intent-to-treat; n, number of patients; SoC, standard of care.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Comparison of the family abundance in the gut microbiome during the two stages of the BEYOND project The relative abundances of the 20 most common families in stool are shown for participants of the first stage of the project (upper row (A), n = 61) and the second stage of the project (lower row (B), n = 81). Each row provides separate distribution for patients with favorable and unfavorable outcomes of the Clostridioides difficile infection. The analysis of the second stage contains patients who failed screening because of negative BEYOND score and patients who were enrolled in the study and randomized to placebo treatment. The distributions of species between patients with favorable outcome and patients with unfavorable outcome from each stage of the project are similar.

References

    1. Ghosh S., Antunes A., Rinta-Kokko H., Chaparova E., Lay-Flurrie S., Tricotel A., Andersson F.L. Clostridioides difficile infections, recurrences and clinical outcomes in real-world settings from 2015 to 2019: the RECUR England study. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2024;140:31–38. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2024.01.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brestrich G., Angulo F.J., Berger F.K., Brösamle C., Hagel S., Leischker A., Lübbert C., Maechler F., Merbecks S.S., Minarovic N., et al. Epidemiology of Clostridioides difficile infections in Germany, 2010-2019: a review from four public databases. Infect. Dis. Ther. 2023;12:1057–1072. doi: 10.1007/s40121-023-00785-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Li Y., Li J., Chang H.S., Hu Y.H., Xu C.D. Global burden of Clostridium difficile infection-related diarrhea mortality from 1990 to 2021: a study based on the 2021 global burden of disease database. Biomed. Environ. Sci. 2025;38:629–632. doi: 10.3967/bes2025.039. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sohal A., Chaudhry H., Singla P., Sharma R., Kohli I., Dukovic D., Prajapati D. The burden of Clostridioides difficile infection on COVID-19 hospitalizations in the USA. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2023;38:590–597. doi: 10.1111/jgh.16128. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Czepiel J., Dróżdż M., Pituch H., Kuijper E.J., Perucki W., Mielimonka A., Goldman S., Wultańska D., Garlicki A., Biesiada G. Clostridium difficile infection: review. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2019;38:1211–1221. doi: 10.1007/s10096-019-03539-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources