Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2026 Jan;28(1):e70355.
doi: 10.1111/codi.70355.

Surgeon preferences and practice patterns in rectopexy: Results of an international survey

Collaborators, Affiliations

Surgeon preferences and practice patterns in rectopexy: Results of an international survey

Eleftherios Gialamas et al. Colorectal Dis. 2026 Jan.

Abstract

Aim: Rectopexy is the preferred abdominal intervention for rectal prolapse. Despite similar procedural steps - rectal mobilisation, prolapse reduction, and fixation - techniques vary widely, and onsensus on the optimal approach is lacking. This study aimed to assess global surgeon preferences and practices in rectopexy.

Methods: An international 28-item online survey was distributed between November 2023 and March 2024 through professional networks and social media. Questions addressed surgeon demographics, perioperative strategies, and technical approaches to rectopexy. Responses were analysed descriptively and stratified by region and specialty.

Results: A total of 226 surgeons from 36 countries across four continents completed the survey. Most respondents (79.6%) administered preoperative intravenous antibiotics, and 80.5% used some form of mechanical bowel preparation. Minimally invasive approaches predominated (81%), with laparoscopy being most common. Posterior dissection was preferred by 61.5%, while 38.5% favoured ventral (anterior) dissection. Two-thirds (68.1%) routinely used mesh, predominantly synthetic. Only 15% performed rectopexy as a day-case procedure. Regional and specialty-related variations were evident in approach, mesh type, and perioperative protocols.

Conclusion: This international survey reveals marked variability in rectopexy practice worldwide. Despite common principles, surgeon preference and regional factors strongly influence decision-making. The findings emphasise the need for updated international guidelines to harmonise technique selection and perioperative management in rectal prolapse surgery.

Keywords: rectal prolapse; rectopexy; surgeon's preference; survey.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Global distribution of respondents by country (Choropleth map illustrating the number of participating surgeons per country. Darker shading corresponds to higher respondent numbers (range 1–60), while countries in grey had no participants).

References

    1. Tou S, Brown SR, Nelson RL. Surgery for complete (full‐thickness) rectal prolapse in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;2015(11):758.
    1. Sajid MS, Siddiqui MR, Baig MK. Open vs laparoscopic repair of full‐thickness rectal prolapse: a re‐meta‐analysis. Color Dis. 2010;12(6):515–525.
    1. D'Hoore A, Penninckx F. Laparoscopic ventral recto(colpo)pexy for rectal prolapse: surgical technique and outcome for 109 patients. Surg Endosc. 2006;20(12):1919–1923. - PubMed
    1. Lechaux D, Trebuchet G, Siproudhis L, Campion JP. Laparoscopic rectopexy for full‐thickness rectal prolapse: a single‐institution retrospective study. Surg Endosc. 2005;19(4):514–518. - PubMed
    1. Keating T, Fleming CA, Brannigan AE, Brannigan A, Balla A, Gurland BH, et al. Using a modified Delphi process to explore international surgeon‐reported benefits of robotic‐assisted surgery to perform abdominal rectopexy. Tech Coloproctol. 2022;26(12):953–962. - PubMed

MeSH terms