Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2026 Jan;40(1):61-74.
doi: 10.1177/15459683251399131. Epub 2026 Jan 5.

Left DLPFC as a Frontal-Vagal Hub in Post-Brain Injury Dysregulation: iTBS Evidence From Dual-Modality Neuronavigation

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Left DLPFC as a Frontal-Vagal Hub in Post-Brain Injury Dysregulation: iTBS Evidence From Dual-Modality Neuronavigation

Tingting Chen et al. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2026 Jan.

Abstract

BackgroundPost-brain injury autonomic dysfunction, mediated by frontal-vagal network (FVN) dysregulation, lacks noninvasive tools for functional mapping and targeted neuromodulation.ObjectiveTo characterize autonomic impairment after brain injury, testify left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) as an FVN hub, and validate a closed-loop intermittent theta-burst stimulation coupled with heart rate variability monitoring (iTBS-HRV) paradigm for FVN assessment.MethodsThis exploratory, secondary analysis integrated data from 3 coordinated investigations conducted using a dual-modality platform that combined structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided optical neuronavigation with real-time HRV biofeedback: (1) autonomic profiling through HRV analysis comparing 59 brain-injured patients with 30 healthy controls; (2) A randomized crossover trial using MRI-neuronavigation iTBS to compare left versus right DLPFC stimulation effects on HRV in 15 participants; and (3) a translation study applied closed-loop iTBS-HRV intervention in 17 patients to quantify FVN responsivity. Key HRV metrics: root-mean-square of successive RR intervals differences ([RMSSD]; vagal tone), (high-frequency [HF]), low-frequency (LF)/HF (sympathovagal balance), and standard deviation of RR intervals ([SDNN]; global variability).ResultsPatients showed severe autonomic dysfunction with reduced vagal tone (RMSSD: 18.6 ms vs 36.7 ms, P < .001) and global variability (SDNN: 21.3 ms vs 50.9 ms, P < .001). Left frontal lesions exacerbate sympathovagal imbalance (LF/HF ↑2.40, P < .05). Left DLPFC iTBS selectively enhanced vagal modulation (ΔHF%: +2.73, P < .01; ΔLF/HF: -1.60, P < .001), confirming lateralized hub function, while patients exhibited attenuated HRV responses (ΔRMSSD: 0.50 ms vs 3.34 ms in controls, P < .01).ConclusionThe dual-modality iTBS-HRV framework provides an effective approach for mapping FVN dysfunction and targeting the left DLPFC hub for neuromodulation after brain injury.

Keywords: autonomic dysfunction; brain injury; frontal–vagal network; heart rate variability; intermittent theta-burst stimulation; left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Publication types

MeSH terms