Cognitive and Psychosocial Outcome in Children and Adolescents Treated for Extracranial Malignant Solid Tumors and Lymphomas in the RISK-N Study
- PMID: 41518041
- DOI: 10.1002/1545-5017.70073
Cognitive and Psychosocial Outcome in Children and Adolescents Treated for Extracranial Malignant Solid Tumors and Lymphomas in the RISK-N Study
Abstract
Objective: Recent studies show evidence of cognitive and psychosocial impairments and reduced quality of life (QoL) in adult survivors of childhood extracranial solid tumors and lymphomas, but limited research has addressed these issues in pediatric populations.
Study design: The French RISK-N prospective study (2014-2021) evaluated 278 survivors of extracranial solid tumors or lymphomas (47% female, mean age at diagnosis and assessment: 6.2 and 11.7 years). Patients with pre-existing neurological conditions were excluded. Sociodemographic, disease-related, and treatment data were collected. Cognitive performance was assessed using Wechsler Intelligence Scales for Children (WISC-IV, WISC-V). Psychosocial outcomes included parent and/or patient-reported executive functions (Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function), behavior (Conner's Parent Rating Scale), QoL (Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory), fatigue (Multidimensional Fatigue Scale), and depression (Children's Depression Inventory). Information on schooling and educational/rehabilitative interventions was also recorded.
Results: Diagnoses included lymphoma (25%), nephroblastoma (19%), neuroblastoma (19%), osteosarcoma (7%), other sarcomas (18%), and other tumors (12%). Mean Full Scale Intellectual Quotient [M(SD) = 99.44(15.62)] was as expected in the general population [M(SD) = 100(15)], but the WISC-IV Perceptual Reasoning Index was slightly lower [M(SD) = 95.4(15.0), <1.5 SD 14%]. Parent- and self-reports indicated greater executive dysfunction, inattention, fatigue, and reduced QoL. In multivariable regression models, poorer cognitive outcomes were associated with lower parental education and developmental/learning delays before diagnosis.
Conclusions: Objective cognitive deficits were uncommon among pediatric cancer survivors, contrasting with a relatively high level of subjective cognitive and psychosocial complaints, highlighting the need for systematic screening and tailored clinical interventions.
Keywords: intellectual quotient; lymphomas; neurocognitive outcome; pediatric extracranial solid tumors; psychosocial outcome.
© 2026 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
References
-
- E. S. Tonorezos, R. J. Cohn, A. W. Glaser, et al., “Long‐Term Care for People Treated for Cancer during Childhood and Adolescence,” Lancet 399, no. 10334 (2022): 1561–1572, doi:10.1016/S0140‐6736(22)00460‐3.
-
- K. A. Greenzang, H. Al‐Sayegh, C. Ma, M. Najafzadeh, E. Wittenberg, and J. W. Mack, “Parental Considerations Regarding Cure and Late Effects for Children with Cancer,” Pediatrics 145, no. 5 (2020): e20193552, doi:10.1542/peds.2019‐3552.
-
- M. A. Askins and B. D. Moore, “Preventing Neurocognitive Late Effects in Childhood Cancer Survivors,” Journal of Child Neurology 23, no. 10 (2008): 1160–1171, doi:10.1177/0883073808321065.
-
- N. S. Kadan‐Lottick, L. K. Zeltzer, Q. Liu, et al., “Neurocognitive Functioning in Adult Survivors of Childhood Non‐Central Nervous System Cancers,” JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute 102, no. 12 (2010): 881–893, doi:10.1093/jnci/djq156.
-
- M. N. Edelmann, V. M. Daryani, M. W. Bishop, et al., “Neurocognitive and Patient‐Reported Outcomes in Adult Survivors of Childhood Osteosarcoma,” JAMA Oncology 2, no. 2 (2016): 201, doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.4398.
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
