Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2026 Jan 10.
doi: 10.1002/ijc.70320. Online ahead of print.

Lesion distribution and prognosis of renal cell carcinoma bone metastasis: A novel evaluation model based on random survival forests

Affiliations

Lesion distribution and prognosis of renal cell carcinoma bone metastasis: A novel evaluation model based on random survival forests

Zixiong Huang et al. Int J Cancer. .

Abstract

The prognostic value of lesion distribution in renal cell carcinoma bone metastasis (RCC-BM) is unclear. This study aimed to quantify the association between BM distribution and prognosis in RCC-BM patients and to employ a predictive model based on the random survival forests (RSF) algorithm. At first BM diagnosis, 122 patients were stratified by Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC)/Motzer risk score and classified into locoregional (21.3%), stochastic (56.6%), and extensive (22.1%) groups based on bone lesion distribution. Spinal and pelvic involvement was observed in 39.3% and 35.2% of patients. Univariate, logistic regression, and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses indicated that locoregional spread, spinal involvement (odds ratio [OR] 3.30; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.20-9.09), and advanced age (OR 1.04; 95% CI 1.00-1.08; p < .05) correlated with higher risk stratifications, while pelvic metastasis was linked to shorter median overall survival (32 vs. 49 months; p < .05). The RSF model was trained in 70% and validated in 30% of the series, incorporating spatial lesion involvement (pelvic, spinal, and upper extremities involvement), MSKCC/Motzer score, and age as principal contributing variables. Time-dependent area under the curve (AUC) values achieved in single-split validation for 1- and 3-year survival were 0.90 and 0.87. Consistent performance was observed across 100 repeated splits, with median AUCs of 0.89, 0.86, and 0.89 for 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival, respectively. A cut-off value of 15.03 effectively separated high- and low-risk groups (p < .05). RSF demonstrated superior accuracy over Cox regression (median AUC 0.89 vs. 0.59 for 1-year survival). Overall, integrating bone lesion patterns into RSF modeling facilitates personalized prognosis and supports more precise care in RCC-BM.

Keywords: lesion distribution; predictive model; random survival forests; renal cell carcinoma bone metastasis.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Chandrasekar T, Klaassen Z, Goldberg H, Kulkarni GS, Hamilton RJ, Fleshner NE. Metastatic renal cell carcinoma: patterns and predictors of metastases—a contemporary population‐based series. Urol Oncol. 2017;35(11):661.e7‐661.e14. doi:10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.06.060
    1. Huang Z, Du Y, Zhang X, Liu SJ, Xu T. Clinical and pathological analysis of renal cell carcinoma bone metastasis. J Peking Univ (Health Sci). 2018;50(5):811‐815. doi:10.19723/j.issn.1671‐167X.2018.05.008
    1. Ivanyi P, Koenig J, Trummer A, et al. Does the onset of bone metastasis in sunitinib‐treated renal cell carcinoma patients impact the overall survival. World J Urol. 2016;34(7):909‐915. doi:10.1007/s00345‐015‐1707‐0
    1. Fottner A, Szalantzy M, Wirthmann L, et al. Bone metastases from renal cell carcinoma: patient survival after surgical treatment. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010;11(1):145. doi:10.1186/1471‐2474‐11‐145
    1. Mosele GR, Caggiari G, Scarpa RM, Doria C. The treatment of vertebral metastases from renal cell carcinoma: a retrospective study. Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2017;69(2):166‐172. doi:10.23736/S0393‐2249.16.02809‐5

LinkOut - more resources