Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2026 Jan 7;9(1):3.
doi: 10.5334/joc.474. eCollection 2026.

Global and Selective Effects of Auditory Attention on Arousal: Insights From Pupil Dilation

Affiliations

Global and Selective Effects of Auditory Attention on Arousal: Insights From Pupil Dilation

Aurélie Grandjean et al. J Cogn. .

Abstract

Theoretical models of attention propose that norepinephrine (NE) can induce both a global boost of arousal and selective amplification of high-priority stimuli, yet few tasks have tested these dual effects in humans. Here, we used pupillometry in an auditory detection task, the Competitive Attention Test (CAT), previously performed in large cohort studies, to examine how task engagement (active vs. passive) and stimulus relevance (informative vs. uninformative cues) modulate arousal. Results showed that both relevant and irrelevant sounds elicited larger pupil dilation under active conditions, indicating a global arousal effect. Crucially, only relevant sounds benefited from an additional dilation when preceded by an informative cue, demonstrating a selective arousal mechanism associated to top-down attention. These findings illustrate the NE's dual role in boosting overall alertness while selectively enhancing high-priority stimuli. Beyond theoretical implications, this work highlights that the CAT captures measurable arousal components, reinforcing its utility for clinical assessments of attention-arousal clinical disruptions.

Keywords: Attention; Auditory perception; Eye movements.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no competing interests to declare.

Figures

Protocole for active trials, from the cue presentation until the button press with all the distractor conditions.
Figure 1
Protocol for active trials. All trials started with a visual cue (200 ms duration) and contained a monaural target sound presented 910–950 ms after cue offset. Subjects were asked to press the mouse button as fast as possible when they heard the target sound (a dog bark). In trials without distractor (NoDIS trials, 50%, blue box), only the cue and the target were presented. In trials with distractors (DIS trials, 50%, green box), a binaural distracting sound (300 ms duration, symbolized by black triangles) was presented during the delay. The distracting sound could equiprobably appear in three different time periods before the target onset: 410–450 ms (DIS1), 210–250 ms (DIS2), and 10–50 ms (DIS3) (see corresponding cue-distractor delays in the figure). In 75% of the (noDIS and DIS) trials, a dog facing left or right indicated in which ear (left or right) the target sound would be played (informative cue). In the other 25% of the trials, a dog facing front did not provide any indication in which ear the target sound would be played (uninformative cue)
Reaction time results according to cue and distractor conditions
Figure 2
Behavioral results. Mean reaction time as a function of cue type (informative in brown or uninformative in orange) and distractor condition (NoDIS, DIS1, DIS2, DIS3). Error bars represent within-subject standard errors of the mean. **p < .01, ***p < .001 (after Bonferroni correction).
Cue-locked pupil response in NoDIS trials according to task (A) and cue (B) conditions
Figure 3
Cue-locked pupil response (group-average, 250-ms pre-cue baseline subtraction) in trials without distractor (NoDIS trials). A: Mean pupil dilation in AAV, PAV conditions and the subtraction between the two. B: Mean pupil difference curves (AAV-PAV) for informative & uninformative cue conditions. Shadowed areas surrounding the curves represent standard errors of the mean. Examples of stimuli presented to participants are shown at their relative onset (for the target, the mean onset latency is indicated). Blue areas indicate time-windows where the task (A) or the cue (B) effect are significant. For these time windows, boxplots with individual data are depicted (mean pupil dilation amplitude in 500 ms time-windows). Within each boxplot, the horizontal line represents the group median, the box the first and third quartiles, the whiskers the largest value under 1.5*IQR. (IQR = inter-quartile range). Superimposed to each boxplot, the dots represent individual means. *p < .05, ***p < .001. AAV: Active Audio-Visual condition, PAV: Passive Audio-Visual condition, inf: informative, uninf: uninformative.
Distractor-locked-corrected pupil response according to task (A) and cue (B) conditions
Figure 4
Distractor-locked-corrected pupil response (group-average, subtraction of the surrogate DIS-locked PR & 250-ms pre-distractor baseline subtraction). A: Mean pupil dilation in AAV, PAV conditions and the subtraction between the two. B: Mean pupil difference curves for informative & uninformative cue conditions. Shadowed areas surrounding the curves represent standard errors of the mean. The blue area (A) corresponds to the time windows where the task effect is significant. For these time windows, boxplots with individual data are depicted (mean pupil dilation amplitude in 500 ms time-windows). Within each boxplot, the horizontal line represents the group median, the box the first and third quartiles, the whiskers the largest value under 1.5*IQR. (IQR = inter-quartile range). Superimposed to each boxplot, the dots represent individual means. *p < .05, **p < .01. AAV: Active Audio-Visual condition, PAV: Passive Audio-Visual condition, inf: informative, uninf: uninformative.
Distractor-locked pupil response according to distractor position with a 250m pre-distractor (A) or a pre-cue (B) baseline correction
Figure 5
Distractor-locked pupil response (group-average, AAV-PAV subtraction curves) as a function of the distractor position (DIS1, DIS2, DIS3). A: with a 250-ms pre-distractor baseline subtraction. B: with a 250-ms pre-cue baseline correction. Shadowed areas surrounding the curves represent standard errors of the mean. Blue areas correspond to the time window where the distractor position is significant. For these time windows, boxplots with individual data are depicted (mean pupil dilation amplitude in 500 ms time-windows). Within each boxplot, the horizontal line represents the group median, the box the first and third quartiles, the whiskers the largest value under 1.5*IQR. (IQR = inter-quartile range). Superimposed to each boxplot, the dots represent individual means. *p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .001. AAV-PAV: Active Audio-Visual – Passive Audio-Visual condition.

References

    1. Aguera, P. E., Jerbi, K., Caclin, A., & Bertrand, O. (2011). ELAN: a software package for analysis and visualization of MEG, EEG, and LFP signals. Comput Intell Neurosci, 2011, 158970. 10.1155/2011/158970 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aminihajibashi, S., Hagen, T., Laeng, B., & Espeseth, T. (2020). Pupillary and behavioral markers of alerting and orienting: An individual difference approach. Brain Cogn, 143, 105597. 10.1016/j.bandc.2020.105597 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aston-Jones, G., & Cohen, J. D. (2005). AN INTEGRATIVE THEORY OF LOCUS COERULEUS-NOREPINEPHRINE FUNCTION: Adaptive Gain and Optimal Performance. Annu Rev Neurosci, 28(1), 403–50. 10.1146/annurev.neuro.28.061604.135709 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bidet-Caulet, A., Bottemanne, L., Fonteneau, C., Giard, M. H., & Bertrand, O. (2015). Brain Dynamics of Distractibility: Interaction Between Top-Down and Bottom-Up Mechanisms of Auditory Attention. Brain Topogr, 28(3), 423–36. 10.1007/s10548-014-0354-x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bidet-Caulet, A., Latinus, M., Roux, S., Malvy, J., Bonnet-Brilhault, F., & Bruneau, N. (2017). Atypical sound discrimination in children with ASD as indicated by cortical ERPs. Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders, 9, 13. 10.1186/s11689-017-9194-9 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources