A service evaluation of 'IDEAS' - Modular treatment for youth with complex emotional needs
- PMID: 41532444
- DOI: 10.1111/bjc.70034
A service evaluation of 'IDEAS' - Modular treatment for youth with complex emotional needs
Abstract
Objectives: There is a crucial need for an evidence-based intervention for young people presenting with moderate complex emotional needs (CEN). UK CEN care has been described as variable and poor quality, with its improvement a UK policy priority. Briefer-versions of full-programme therapy packages utilizing stepped-care models offer a clear and contained pathway for this population, though their current availability in services is scarce. This service evaluation aims to evaluate the efficacy of 'IDEAS' as a piloted brief psychological intervention for young people aged 16-25 presenting with moderate CEN.
Method: A pre-test/post-test design was used to explore clinical outcomes for participants and services via paired sample t-tests, mixed-model ANOVAS and frequency statistics.
Results: Exploratory pre/post-intervention analyses revealed significant reductions in mean scores for the severity of borderline personality disorder symptoms (d = .83), emotion regulation (d = 1.15) and overall wellbeing (reflecting improvement; d = .97) and increases in mean scores for quality of life (d = -.67), including level of satisfaction in one's quality of life and of therapeutic treatment received (d = -.65). These outcomes were maintained at 3-month follow-up, were little influenced by clinician training and supported readiness for discharge post-intervention for more (68.65%) participants.
Conclusions: The current evaluation provides preliminary evidence that IDEAS may offer a feasible, lower-cost alternative to full-programme treatment packages, with benefits for young people, services and Trusts. Given this evaluation of IDEAS being from a small, uncontrolled pilot, the findings are exploratory. Further evaluation is therefore warranted upon its larger-scale implementation.
Keywords: borderline personality disorder; complex emotional needs; emotional dysregulation; mental health; psychological intervention; psychological treatment.
© 2026 The Author(s). British Journal of Clinical Psychology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Psychological Society.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Ahmed, S. P., Bittencourt‐Hewitt, A., & Sebastian, C. L. (2015). Neurocognitive bases of emotion regulation development in adolescence. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 11–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2015.07.006
-
- Barkham, M., & Lambert, M. J. (2021). The efficacy and effectiveness of psychological therapies. In M. Barkham, W. Lutz, & L. G. Castonguay (Eds.), Bergin and Garfield's handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change: 50th anniversary edition (7th ed., pp. 135–189). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
-
- Baruch, G., Vrouva, I., & Fearon, P. (2009). A follow‐up study of characteristics of young people that dropout and continue psychotherapy: Service implications for a clinic in the community. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 14(2), 69–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475‐3588.2008.00492.x
-
- Bennett‐Levy, J., Richards, D., Farrand, P., Christensen, H., Griffiths, K., Kavanagh, D., Klein, B., Lau, A. M., Proudfoot, J., Ritterband, L., White, J., & Williams, C. (2010). Oxford guide to low intensity CBT interventions. Oxford University Press.
-
- Blackford, J. U., & Love, R. (2011). Dialectical behavior therapy group skills training in a community mental health setting: A pilot study. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 61(4), 645–657. https://doi.org/10.1521/ijgp.2011.61.4.645
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
