Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction combined with anterolateral ligament reconstruction using hamstring autograft versus anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft: a randomised controlled trial with 5-year follow-up
- PMID: 41536854
- PMCID: PMC12796003
- DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2025.101561
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction combined with anterolateral ligament reconstruction using hamstring autograft versus anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft: a randomised controlled trial with 5-year follow-up
Abstract
Background: Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) rupture is common knee injury. Although ACL reconstruction (ACLR) is standard, graft failure rates remain high in young active patients. This study investigated whether combining ACLR with anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction (ALLR) reduces grafts failure compared with ACLR.
Methods: In this prospective, single-centre, randomised controlled trial conducted at the Santy Orthopedic Center in Lyon, France, patients aged 18-35 years with symptomatic ACL rupture were randomly allocated (1:1) to ACL + ALL reconstruction using hamstring tendon autograft (ACLR + ALLR) or ACLR with bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft (ACLR). Randomisation was performed with a block size of four using telematic software by an independent study coordinator, with concealed allocation. Surgeons were informed of the assigned procedure on the morning of surgery. Outcome assessors were not blinded. The primary outcome was graft failure at 5 years, assessed clinically and by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) by an independent sports medicine physicians not involved in the index surgery. Efficacy analyses were performed on the Full Analysis Set in accordance with the intention-to-treat principle, while safety analyses were conducted on the Safety Set. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, ID NCT03740022. The trial has been completed.
Findings: Between November 11, 2016, and January 20, 2020, 593 patients were randomized (297 assigned to ACLR + ALLR and 296 to ACLR). The mean age was 25.0 years (SD 4.5); 447 (75%) participants were male and 146 (25%) female. Of these 593 patients, 556 (94%) completed a mean 5-year follow-up. Graft failure occurred in 12/283 (4.2%) with ACLR + ALLR versus 28/273 (10.3%) with ACLR (p = 0.006; adjusted odds ratio 2.54 [95% CI 1.27; 5.36]-p = 0.008). The number needed to treat was 17 overall, and 9 in patients younger than 25 years.
Interpretation: In our study of young, active adults with ACL rupture, who are considered high-risk for graft failure, combining ACL reconstruction with anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ACLR + ALLR) significantly decreased graft failure compared with ACLR. These results suggest that ACLR + ALLR might be beneficial for young or highly active individuals and provide a basis for future research to refine patient selection, evaluate long-term outcomes beyond five years, and explore benefits in other subgroups of patients with ACL injuries.
Funding: GCS Ramsay Santé pour l'Enseignement et la Recherche funds the scientific activity at the Santy center.
Keywords: ACL; Clinical Outcomes; Graft failure; LEAP; Randomised controlled trial; Reoperation rate.
© 2025 The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Alessandro Carrozzo reports a fellowship grant from Arthrex. Adnan Saithna, Bertrand Sonnery-Cottet, Jean-Marie Fayard, and Mathieu Thaunat report consulting fees from Arthrex, with Sonnery-Cottet, Fayard, and Thaunat also receiving research grants from Arthrex. Sonnery-Cottet reports equity ownership in AREAS, and Fayard reports consulting fees from Newclip Techniques. Benjamin Freychet, Hervé Poilvache, and Thais Dutra Vieira have nothing to disclose.
Figures
References
-
- Kaeding C.C., Léger-St-Jean B., Magnussen R.A. Epidemiology and diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament injuries. Clin Sports Med. 2017;36:1–8. - PubMed
-
- Firth A.D., Bryant D.M., Litchfield R., et al. Predictors of graft failure in young active patients undergoing hamstring autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with or without a lateral extra-articular tenodesis: the STABILITY experience. Am J Sports Med. 2022;50:384–395. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Grassi A., Ardern C.L., Marcheggiani Muccioli G.M., Neri M.P., Marcacci M., Zaffagnini S. Does revision ACL reconstruction measure up to primary surgery? A meta-analysis comparing patient-reported and clinician-reported outcomes, and radiographic results. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50:716–724. - PubMed
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
