Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2026 Jan 14;36(2):103077.
doi: 10.1016/j.fjurol.2026.103077. Online ahead of print.

Hemorrhagic and thrombotic complications following robotic-assisted prostatectomy (RALP) with risk-adapted antithrombotic prophylaxis: A retrospective study

Affiliations
Free article

Hemorrhagic and thrombotic complications following robotic-assisted prostatectomy (RALP) with risk-adapted antithrombotic prophylaxis: A retrospective study

Alice Rondot et al. Fr J Urol. .
Free article

Abstract

Background: Despite advances in robotic-assisted prostatectomy and enhanced postoperative rehabilitation protocols, approximately 20% of patients still experience complications - most frequently hemorrhagic. To evaluate the effect of discontinuing systematic PAP (pharmacologic anticoagulant prophylaxis) on postoperative complications - specifically hemorrhagic and thrombotic events - after robotic-assisted prostatectomy.

Methods: In this retrospective before-and-after study, 361 consecutive patients undergoing prostatectomy at a single center were included. Group I (n=173) received systematic PAP with low molecular weight heparin for 28 days postoperatively, alongside routine physical prophylaxis (early mobilization, adequate hydration, and intraoperative leg compression). Group II (n=188) received only routine physical prophylaxis. The primary endpoints were hemorrhagic and thrombotic complications.

Results: Clavien-Dindo≥II complications were significantly more frequent in Group I (20.2%) compared to Group II (12.2%, P<0.05). Hemorrhagic complications occurred in 10% of patients overall, with a significantly higher rate in Group I (15.0% vs. 3.7%, P<0.05). Thrombotic events were rare in both groups and not statistically different 2.3% vs. 3.7% (P=0.3). Thrombotic risk did not show a statistically significant difference in adjusted models with propensity score methods.

Conclusions: Our study suggest that systematic anticoagulation may increase hemorrhagic morbidity without a clear thrombotic benefit. These findings support a risk-adapted, individualized approach rather than routine pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis.

Keywords: Cancer de prostate; Extended prophylaxis; Prostate cancer; Prostatectomie totale; Prostatectomie voie robot-assistée; Radical prostatectomy; Robotic prostatectomy; Thromboprophylaxie; Tromboembolie veineuse; Venous thromboembolism.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure of interest The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

LinkOut - more resources