Association between COVID-19 vaccine efficacy and epidemic force of infection
- PMID: 41547989
- PMCID: PMC12921246
- DOI: 10.1038/s41541-026-01374-3
Association between COVID-19 vaccine efficacy and epidemic force of infection
Abstract
The association between vaccine efficacy (VE) and force of infection (FoI) remains incompletely understood. Previous analyses have been primarily based on trial-level summary data-not accounting for the effect of time and constrained by the number of trials. Here, we leverage individual-level data from three phase 3 randomized, placebo-controlled COVID-19 vaccine trials-the COVE trial (Moderna, CoVPN3001), the AZD1222 trial (AstraZeneca, CoVPN3002), and the ENSEMBLE trial (Janssen/Johnson & Johnson, CoVPN3003)-and contemporaneous geographic-location-specific SARS-CoV-2 surveillance data from the start of the pandemic through November 14, 2021 (including the blinded follow-up periods of the trials) to conduct five cohort- and vaccine-specific analyses: COVE (U.S.), AZD1222 overall (U.S. + non-U.S.), AZD1222 U.S., ENSEMBLE overall (U.S. + non-U.S.), and ENSEMBLE U.S. In AZD1222 U.S., higher VE was associated with higher FoI (p = 0.01). In ENSEMBLE overall, lower VE was marginally associated with higher FoI (p = 0.21), further supported by a region-specific analysis. In COVE, AZD1222 overall, and ENSEMBLE U.S., no VE-FoI association was found. These findings highlighted a new perspective: the VE-FoI association appears complex, potentially influenced by FoI levels, with patterns suggesting an inverted U-shaped relationship, showing a positive association at low FoI levels and a negative association at high levels.
© 2026. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: Dr Sobieszczyk reported receiving grant support to the institution from the NIH during the conduct of the study and grant support to the institution from the Gates Foundation, Sanofi SA, Merck, Sharpe and Dohme, and Gilead Sciences Inc. outside the submitted work. Dr El Sahly reported receiving grant support from the NIAID during the conduct of the study. Dr Baden reported receiving grant support from the NIH during the conduct of the study. Dr Falsey reported receiving grant support from AstraZeneca during the conduct of the study and grant support from AstraZeneca, Pfizer Inc., and CyanVac LLC, and personal fees for serving on an advisory board from Merck & Co. Inc., GSK, ADMA Biologics Inc., and Moderna Inc. outside the submitted work. Dr Hirsch reported holding stock or stock options in AstraZeneca. Dr Neuzil reported receiving grant support from Pfizer Inc. and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) during the conduct of the study. Dr Janes reported receiving grant support from the NIH during the conduct of the study. Dr Gilbert reported receiving grant support to the institution from the NIAID and NIH during the conduct of the study and serving on the vaccine scientific advisory boards for Moderna Inc. and AstraZeneca. Dr Huang reported receiving grant support from the NIH during the conduct of the study. All other authors declare no competing interests.
Figures
References
-
- World Health Organization. Status of COVID-19 Vaccines within WHO EUL/PQ evaluation process, https://extranet.who.int/prequal/sites/default/files/document_files/Stat... (2023).
-
- Halloran M. E., Longini I. M. & Struchiner C. J. Design and Analysis of Vaccine Studies. (Springer New York, NY, 2010).
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
