Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2026 Jan 5:16:1754679.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1754679. eCollection 2025.

Path tracking control method for tracked agricultural vehicles based on slip-aware look-ahead point offset

Affiliations

Path tracking control method for tracked agricultural vehicles based on slip-aware look-ahead point offset

Huanyu Liu et al. Front Plant Sci. .

Abstract

Introduction: Tracked agricultural vehicles operating in complex farmland environments are prone to track slip, which degrades path-tracking accuracy and may lead to unstable motion. To address the limitations of conventional geometric tracking algorithms under slip conditions, this study proposes a slip-aware look-ahead point offset path-tracking control method for tracked agricultural machinery.

Methods: An extended Kalman filter (EKF) is developed to fuse RTK-IMU pose measurements with track wheel-speed feedback, enabling real-time estimation of left and right track slip ratios. Based on the estimated slip difference, a target-point offset compensation mechanism is constructed, and the offset angle is optimized online using an improved particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm with a Chebyshev-window-based inertia weight strategy. In addition, a fuzzy controller is employed to adaptively adjust the look-ahead distance according to vehicle speed and path curvature, while a first-order low-pass filter is applied to smooth the commanded velocities.

Results: Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed method significantly reduces lateral tracking errors and maintains smooth trajectories under severe slip conditions. Field experiments conducted at speeds of 0.35 m/s and 0.75 m/s show that the proposed method reduces the maximum lateral deviation by 78.1% and the average deviation by 50.6% compared with the traditional fuzzy pure pursuit algorithm. At 0.75 m/s, the maximum and average deviations are further reduced by 63.1% and 57.6%, respectively.

Discussion: The results confirm that incorporating slip estimation and slip-aware target-point offset compensation effectively enhances path-tracking accuracy and robustness for tracked agricultural vehicles operating on soft and high-slip terrain. The proposed lightweight control framework provides a practical and reliable solution for autonomous navigation and plant-protection operations in complex farmland environments.

Keywords: extended Kalman filter; improved particle swarm optimization; pure pursuit algorithm; slip compensation; tracked agricultural machinery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Kinematic modeling schematic of a tracked agricultural vehicle.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Geometric relationship schematic of the pure pursuit path-tracking algorithm.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Overall flowchart of the control system.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Schematic of target point offset and trajectory response under slip compensation.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Distribution diagram of membership functions.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Surface of fuzzy control rules.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Comparison of variation trends under different inertia weight decay strategies.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Schematic of path and slip condition settings. (a) Reference path diagram, (b) Path curvature variation curve, (c) Left and right track slip ratio variation diagram.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Path-tracking comparison results (including locally enlarged view).
Figure 10
Figure 10
Variation curve of offset compensation angle with time steps.
Figure 11
Figure 11
Path-tracking experimental platform of tracked agricultural vehicle and composition of the control system. (a) Tracked agricultural vehicle (real machine), (b) Control system composition diagram.
Figure 12
Figure 12
Real-vehicle experiment of navigation tracking.
Figure 13
Figure 13
Path-tracking comparison at different speeds. (a) Set vehicle speed v=0.35m/s, (b) Set vehicle speed v=0.75m/s.
Figure 14
Figure 14
Lateral deviation comparison curves under different speed conditions.

References

    1. Arasomwan M. A., Adewumi A. O. (2013). A novel adaptive fuzzy sliding mode controller for mobile robots path tracking. Sci. World J. 2013, 860289. doi: 10.1155/2013/860289, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bai G., Liu L., Meng Y., Liu S., Liu L., Luo W., et al. (2020). Real-time path tracking of mobile robots based on nonlinear model predictive control. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 51, 47–52. doi: 10.6041/j.issn.1000-1298.2020.09.006 - DOI
    1. Chen J., Wang Y. (2024). Review of path tracking control methods for unmanned tractors. J. Agric. Mechanization Res. 46, 1–7. doi: 10.13427/j.cnki.njyi.20240018.005 - DOI
    1. Chen K., Xie S., Chen C., Xiang W., Liu W. (2024). Research on differential navigation system of agricultural machinery in hilly areas based on dual preview pure tracking algorithm. J. Chin. Agric. Mechanization 45, 187–193. doi: 10.13733/j.jcam.issn.20955553.2024.02.027 - DOI
    1. Cui B., Sun Y., Ji F., Wei X., Zhu Y., Zhang S., et al. (2022). Path tracking algorithm of agricultural machinery for whole field based on fuzzy Stanley model. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 53, 43–48. doi: 10.6041/j.issn.1000-1298.2022.12.004 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources