Outcomes of Mitral Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair in Patients With Small Mitral Valve Area
- PMID: 41561344
- PMCID: PMC12813607
- DOI: 10.1016/j.shj.2025.100772
Outcomes of Mitral Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair in Patients With Small Mitral Valve Area
Abstract
Background: A small baseline mitral valve area (MVA) raises concern for iatrogenic mitral stenosis due to increased transmitral pressure gradients (TMPG) after mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER). Outcomes in patients with MVA <4.0 cm² remain limited, as this population has been largely excluded from clinical trials.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 305 consecutive patients who underwent M-TEER (2014-2022). Patients were stratified by baseline MVA (<4.0 cm2 vs. ≥4.0 cm2). The primary endpoint was 2-year all-cause mortality. Secondary endpoints included heart failure hospitalization (HFH), mitral regurgitation (MR) reduction, New York Heart Association functional class improvement, and postprocedural TMPG.
Results: Of 305 patients, 66 (21.6%) had MVA <4.0 cm². Women were more prevalent in the small MVA group (57.6% vs. 42.7%; p = 0.03). Patients with smaller MVA received fewer clips (1.3 ± 0.07 vs. 1.5 ± 0.04; p = 0.03). Procedural success and in-hospital outcomes were comparable. At discharge, residual MR (<moderate) and New York Heart Association class were similar, although TMPG was higher in the small group (3.9 ± 0.2 vs. 3.3 ± 0.1 mmHg; p = 0.006). At 30 days and 1 year, mortality, HFH, and residual MR rates remained similar. Two-year Kaplan-Meier analyses showed no differences in survival, HFH, or composite outcomes. In multivariable analysis, age, creatinine, and hemoglobin predicted mortality, while age, LVEF, and hemoglobin predicted the composite outcome. Indexed MVA did not predict mortality or elevated TMPG.
Conclusions: M-TEER can be safely and effectively performed in patients with baseline MVA <4.0 cm2 without adverse clinical outcomes through 2 years.
Keywords: MitraClip; Mitral regurgitation; Mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair; Mitral valve area; Percutaneous mitral valve repair.
© 2026 The Authors.
Conflict of interest statement
M.D. Atkins is a consultant for W. L. Gore & Associates. M. Reardon is a consultant for Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Abbott, and W. L. Gore & Associates. N.S. Kleiman is a local principal investigator in trials sponsored by Boston Scientific, Medtronic, Abbott, and Edwards Lifesciences. S.S. Goel is a consultant for Medtronic, W. L. Gore & Associates, and JC Medical and is on the Speakers Bureau for Abbott Structural Heart. The other authors had no conflicts to declare.
Figures
Comment in
-
Pushing the Limits of Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair: How Small Can the Mitral Valve Area Go?Struct Heart. 2025 Dec 9;10(2):100782. doi: 10.1016/j.shj.2025.100782. eCollection 2026 Feb. Struct Heart. 2025. PMID: 41657854 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Writing Committee Members, Otto C.M., Nishimura R.A., et al. 2020 ACC/AHA guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021;77(4):e25–e197. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.11.018. - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
