Comparative educational approaches to screening for colorectal cancer
- PMID: 415624
- PMCID: PMC1653860
- DOI: 10.2105/ajph.68.2.135
Comparative educational approaches to screening for colorectal cancer
Abstract
The purpose of the study was to evaluate the public's willingness to perform the do-it-yourself Hemoccult Test for colon-rectum cancer and to assess the relative effectiveness of alternative means of persuading people to do the test. American Cancer Society volunteers in four different part of the country contacted a total of 11,115 members of the American Association of Retired Persons, using five methods that differed in the extent of personal and impersonal contact involved. Other variables such as inclusion of postage and dietary restrictions were studied and cost efficiencies were estimated. The Group Meeting Method was the most effective personal distribution method. The Selective Mail-Out Method was the most effective impersonal method. The return rate was higher when postage was provided. Dietary restrictions did not markedly reduce participation. Including digital examinations did not affect the return rate. The findings suggest that the Hemoccult Test has the potential of reaching a significant proportion of the nation's older population.
Similar articles
-
Mass screening for colorectal cancer by testing for occult blood under restricted diet and a questionnaire in Osaka.Cancer Detect Prev. 1987;10(5-6):353-60. Cancer Detect Prev. 1987. PMID: 3568034
-
[Screening for cancer of the large intestine].Wien Med Wochenschr. 1988 Jun 30;138(11-12):257-60. Wien Med Wochenschr. 1988. PMID: 3051684 Review. German.
-
Participation in mass screening for colorectal cancer with fecal occult blood test.Scand J Gastroenterol. 1986 Dec;21(10):1180-4. doi: 10.3109/00365528608996440. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1986. PMID: 3809993 Clinical Trial.
-
Occult-blood screening for colorectal carcinoma: the benefits.Am J Prev Med. 1985 May-Jun;1(3):3-9. Am J Prev Med. 1985. PMID: 3916713 Review.
-
Hemoccult screening for colorectal cancer. An impact study on Sarasota, Florida.J Fla Med Assoc. 1979 Sep;66(9):915-9. J Fla Med Assoc. 1979. PMID: 479801 No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Methods to increase participation in organised screening programs: a systematic review.BMC Public Health. 2013 May 13;13:464. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-464. BMC Public Health. 2013. PMID: 23663511 Free PMC article.
-
Symposium: Screening for colorectal cancer.Int J Colorectal Dis. 1986 Apr;1(2):63-78. doi: 10.1007/BF01648410. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1986. PMID: 3611937 Clinical Trial. No abstract available.
-
What do family practice residents do in prevention and counselling?Can Fam Physician. 1981 Apr;27:682-9. Can Fam Physician. 1981. PMID: 21289718 Free PMC article.
-
Telephone outreach to increase colorectal cancer screening in an urban minority population.Am J Public Health. 2006 Dec;96(12):2246-53. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.067223. Epub 2006 Oct 31. Am J Public Health. 2006. PMID: 17077394 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The pros and cons of fecal occult blood testing for colorectal neoplasms.Cancer Metastasis Rev. 1987;6(3):397-411. doi: 10.1007/BF00144272. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 1987. PMID: 3319274 Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources