Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Guidance on the scientific data requirements for an application for authorisation of a food additive submitted under Regulation (EC) No 1331/2008

EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF) et al. EFSA J. .

Abstract

This guidance document applies to applications for a new authorisation as well as for a modification of an existing authorisation of a food additive, submitted under Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008. It defines the scientific data required to evaluate if the food additive is safe under the proposed conditions of use, in accordance with Articles 1 and 6 of Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008. The data requirements pertain to the characterisation of the proposed food additive, including the description of its identity, manufacturing process, specifications, stability, reaction and fate in foods and methods of analysis in food; the proposed uses and use levels and the dietary exposure; the safety data, including information on the genotoxic potential of the food additive, toxicological data other than genotoxicity and information on the safety for the environment. For the toxicological studies, a tiered approach is applied, for which the testing requirements, key issues and triggers are described. Applicants should provide data in accordance with this guidance document to support the safety assessment of the proposed food additive. Based on the submitted data, EFSA will assess the safety of the food additive in line with the risk assessment principles described in this document and conclude whether or not it presents risks to human health and to the environment, if applicable, under the proposed conditions of use.

Keywords: EFSA guidance; authorisation; food additives; risk assessment; tiered approach.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Flow chart describing the dietary exposure scenarios of an already authorised food additive for which an extension/modification of use is requested.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Tiered approach for toxicokinetic and toxicity testing of food additives. Supportive data as described in Section 5.4.5 of the guidance (Tier I) are not included in the flow chart. For food additives intended for use in infants below 16 weeks of age this flow chart is not entirely applicable, considering that toxicity data should be provided in line with the recommended by the (EFSA Scientific Committee, 2017a) (for more details see paragraph 5.9). GIT: gastrointestinal tract; GM: gene mutation; MN: micronucleus; TK: toxicokinetic. The following colour code is used to indicate different types of data: grey = non‐testing methods; green = genotoxicity studies; yellow = toxicokinetic studies; blue = general toxicity studies, including reproductive/developmental, chronic toxicity and carcinogenicity. (*) If the proposed food additive is concluded to be genotoxic in vivo via a relevant route of administration, the safety of the food additive cannot be established, and the applicant should not perform any further toxicological testing. If the genotoxicity is restricted to aneugenicity, the EFSA Guidance on aneugenicity (EFSA Scientific Committee, 2021c) should be consulted. If there is no evidence of absorption in Tier I, the integration of in vivo genotoxicity assays into the in vivo toxicity study in Tier II (A) should be envisaged where possible, in line with the 3Rs principle.

References

    1. Beekhuijzen, M. , de Raaf, M. A. , Zmarowski, A. , van Otterdijk, F. , Peter, B. , & Emmen, H. (2014). The underestimated value of OECD 421 and 422 repro screening studies: putting it in the right perspective. Reproductive Toxicology, 48, 81–87. 10.1016/j.reprotox.2014.04.003 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bhat, V. S. , Meek, M. E. ( B.) , Valcke, M. , English, C. , Boobis, A. , & Brown, R. (2017). Evolution of chemical‐specific adjustment factors (CSAF) based on recent international experience; increasing utility and facilitating regulatory acceptance. Critical Reviews in Toxicology, 47(9), 733–753. 10.1080/10408444.2017.1303818 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cattaneo, I. , Astuto, M. C. , Binaglia, M. , Devos, Y. , Dorne, J. L. C. M. , Fernandez Agudo, A. , Fernandez Dumont, A. , Garcia‐Vello, P. , Kass, G. E. N. , Lanzoni, A. , Liem, A. K. D. , Panzarea, M. , Paraskevopulos, K. , Parra Morte, J. M. , Tarazona, J. V. , & Terron, A. (2023). Implementing New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) in food safety assessments: Strategic objectives and actions taken by the European Food Safety Authority. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 133, 277–290. 10.1016/j.tifs.2023.02.006 - DOI
    1. Cramer, G. M. , Ford, R. A. , & Hall, R. L. (1978). Estimation of toxic hazard—A decision tree approach. Food and Cosmetics Toxicology, 16(3), 255–276. 10.1016/s0015-6264(76)80522-6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. ECHA (European Chemicals Agency) . (2008). Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment. Chapter R.6: QSARs and grouping of chemicals. European Chemicals Agency. https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/17224/information_requirements_r6...

LinkOut - more resources