Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2026 Jan 22;16(6):4841-4847.
doi: 10.1039/d5ra08868b. eCollection 2026 Jan 21.

Impact of precursor solution temperature on two-step spin-coated FAPbI3 film elucidated by surface morphology and in situ photoluminescence dynamics

Affiliations

Impact of precursor solution temperature on two-step spin-coated FAPbI3 film elucidated by surface morphology and in situ photoluminescence dynamics

Ryota Okuyama et al. RSC Adv. .

Abstract

Perovskite solar cells fabricated by the two-step spin-coating method are highly sensitive to processing conditions, yet the role of precursor solution temperature remains poorly understood. Here, we systematically investigate how the temperatures of PbI2 and formamidinium iodide (FAI) precursor solutions affect crystallization dynamics, surface morphology, phase formation, and optoelectronic properties of FAPbI3 thin films. By combining microscopic characterization with in situ photoluminescence (PL) monitoring during annealing, we reveal distinct temperature-dependent nucleation, ripening, and film densification processes. PbI2 solutions at intermediate temperatures (50-70 °C) yield compact underlayers that promote homogeneous conversion and suppress residual PbI2, while low-temperature FAI solutions favor stabilization of the photoactive α-phase. Quantitative analysis of the in situ PL evolution clarifies the correlation between crystallization stages and optical out-coupling behavior. These results establish precursor solution temperature as a critical and practical parameter for controlling perovskite film formation in two-step deposition processes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. (a) Schematic illustration of the two-step procedure for fabricating FAPbI3 films. (b–e) SEM images of PbI2 surfaces prepared from precursor solutions at different temperatures: 25 °C (b), 50 °C (c), 70 °C (d), and 90 °C (e).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. (a–d) Optical microscopy images of FAPbI3 surfaces. (e–h) SEM images of FAPbI3 surfaces. The PbI2 precursor solution temperatures used to fabricate the underlayer were 25 °C (a and e), 50 °C (b and f), 70 °C (c and g), and 90 °C (d and h).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Structural and spectroscopic characterizations of FAPbI3 films fabricated by the two-step process at different PbI2 precursor solution temperatures in the first step. (a) XRD patterns. The vertical axis is on a logarithmic scale. (b) Absorbance spectra around FAPbI3 band edge.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. (a–d) Colormaps of in situ PL spectra recorded during the annealing process in the second step. The PbI2 precursor solution temperatures in the first step were 25 °C (a), 50 °C (b), 70 °C (c), and 90 °C (d). The Roman numerals denoted in (a) denote three stages within perovskite crystallization process. (e) Schematic illustration of perovskite crystal growth and PL outcoupling during the second step annealing process. (f) Temporal evolution of in situ PL peak intensity, normalized to the maximum for each dataset. (g) Schematics of perovskite film formation models in the second step. The upper and lower panels correspond to growth models for first-step solution temperatures of 25 or 90 °C, and 50 or 70 °C, respectively.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. (a–d) Images of perovskite films prepared with different FAI precursor solution temperatures: 25 °C (a), 50 °C (b), 70 °C (c), and 90 °C (d). (e) UV-vis absorbance spectra of perovskite films as a function of the second-step solution temperature.

References

    1. Manser J. S. Christians J. A. Kamat P. V. Chem. Rev. 2016;116:12956–13008. - PubMed
    1. Kang J. Wang L.-W. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2017;8:489–493. - PubMed
    1. Eggimann H. J. Patel J. B. Johnston M. B. Herz L. M. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:5525. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Song F. Zheng D. Feng J. Liu J. Ye T. Li Z. Wang K. (Frank) Liu S. Yang D. Adv. Mater. 2024;36:2312041. - PubMed
    1. Best Research-Cell Efficiency Chart, Photovoltaic Research, NREL, https://www.nrel.gov/pv/cell-efficiency, accessed August 5, 2025

LinkOut - more resources