Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2026 Jan 23:euag015.
doi: 10.1093/europace/euag015. Online ahead of print.

Deep learning to predict left ventricular hypertrophy from the electrocardiogram

Affiliations

Deep learning to predict left ventricular hypertrophy from the electrocardiogram

Hafiz Naderi et al. Europace. .

Abstract

Aims: Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is a strong predictor of cardiovascular disease. We previously compared supervised machine learning techniques to classify cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)-derived LVH using ECG and clinical variables in 37,534 UK Biobank participants, obtaining an area under the receiving operating curve (AUROC) of 0.85, but with limited specificity and requiring external validation. In this study, we develop a deep learning (DL) model to improve classification with external evaluation in the Study of Health in Pomerania (SHIP).

Methods and results: We analyzed 12-lead ECGs of 48,835 participants from the UK Biobank imaging study. The dataset was split into a training set (70%), validation set (15%) and test set (15%) for performance evaluation. The model architecture was a fully convolutional network, for which the input was the participants' median ECG and clinical variables and the predicted indexed left ventricular mass (iLVM) as the output. A subsequent logistic regression model was used to recalibrate iLVM predictions. In UK Biobank, 717 (1.5%) participants had CMR-derived LVH and the AUROC for the DL model was 0.97. The ECG components most predictive of LVH were the QRS complex and ventricular rate. The DL model outperformed our supervised algorithms, previous DL modelling efforts and clinical ECG benchmarks. There was modest generalizability of the DL model to 1,423 participants in SHIP (AUROC 0.78), with differences in clinical profile, ECG acquisition and CMR labelling as important factors.

Conclusion: Our findings support the feasibility of scalable DL-based screening tools for prediction of LVH from the ECG, whilst highlighting the need for model development using larger datasets with greater diversity to ensure generalizability.

Keywords: Left ventricular hypertrophy; deep learning; electrocardiogram; machine learning.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources