Development of Mycoinsecticides: Advances in Formulation, Regulatory Challenges and Market Trends for Entomopathogenic Fungi
- PMID: 41590419
- PMCID: PMC12843292
- DOI: 10.3390/jof12010007
Development of Mycoinsecticides: Advances in Formulation, Regulatory Challenges and Market Trends for Entomopathogenic Fungi
Abstract
Bioinsecticides offer eco-friendly alternatives to chemical insecticides and thereby meet the need for sustainable pest control. Entomopathogenic fungi (EPF) represent one of the core classes of microbial insecticides, distinguished by their advantageous contact-based mode of action. Several products have been successfully commercialized, and with continuing improvements to the technology, the market size for EPF continues to grow. The translation of EPF into reliable field performers relies upon formulation technologies that ensure product quality, stability, virulence, and cost-effectiveness. Current formulations comprise diverse solid and liquid states (e.g., wettable powders, oil dispersions) that deliver a range of propagules (conidia, blastospores, microsclerotia). While advanced approaches like nanoparticle encapsulation show promise, some limitations hinder their widespread use. Major constraints include maintaining fungal viability during storage/transport and protecting propagules from harsh environmental factors post-application. Regulatory requirements also present significant barriers to widespread uptake. Addressing these formulation challenges through continued research is essential for advancing mycoinsecticide technology and increasing their contribution to integrated pest management. This review aims to present the latest scientific advances in EPF formulation technologies and application strategies, alongside an overview of current regulatory frameworks and an up-to-date analysis of registered microbial biopesticide products in some of the world's largest markets.
Keywords: entomopathogenic fungi; formulation; microbial control; mycoinsecticides.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Hesketh H., Roy H.E., Eilenberg J., Pell J.K., Hails R.S. Challenges in Modelling Complexity of Fungal Entomopathogens in Semi-Natural Populations of Insects. BioControl. 2010;55:55–73. doi: 10.1007/s10526-009-9249-2. - DOI
-
- Zimmermann G. Review on Safety of the Entomopathogenic Fungus Metarhizium anisopliae. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 2007;17:879–920. doi: 10.1080/09583150701593963. - DOI
-
- Zimmermann G. Review on Safety of the Entomopathogenic Fungi Beauveria bassiana and Beauveria brongniartii. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 2007;17:553–596. doi: 10.1080/09583150701309006. - DOI
-
- Bassi A. Del Mal Del Segno, Calcinaccio o Moscardino: Malattia Che Affligge i Bachi Da Seta. Dalla tipografia Orcesi; Lodi, Italy: 1836.
-
- Davidson E.W. History of Insect Pathology. In: Vega F.E., Kaya H.K., editors. Insect Pathology. 2nd ed. Academic Press; San Diego, CA, USA: 2012. pp. 13–28.
Publication types
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
