Macrophage polarization in hematologic cancers: mechanisms and therapeutic strategies
- PMID: 41653356
- PMCID: PMC12901809
- DOI: 10.1007/s44313-025-00119-w
Macrophage polarization in hematologic cancers: mechanisms and therapeutic strategies
Abstract
Leukemia treatment faces persistent challenges, including chemotherapy resistance and relapse, highlighting macrophage polarization in the tumor microenvironment (TME) as a therapeutic target. Macrophages dynamically shift between antitumor M1 and protumor M2 phenotypes, with M2-polarized tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) dominating leukemia TMEs. These cells secrete IL-10 and TGF-β, fostering immune evasion, angiogenesis, and leukemia stem cell (LSC) survival. In AML, M2 TAMs correlate with poor prognosis and chemoresistance via CSF-1/IL-10 signaling. Polarization is regulated by transcription factors (STAT6, PPARγ, KLF4), hypoxia, and metabolic reprogramming. Therapeutic strategies focus on: (1) M2 depletion (anti-CD163/CD206 antibodies); (2) Pathway inhibition (CCL2/CCR2 or IL-4/STAT6 blockade); (3) Metabolic modulation (glycolysis/OXPHOS targeting); and (4) Phagocytosis enhancement (CD47-SIRPα blockade, HDAC6 inhibition). Preclinical studies demonstrate CSF-1R inhibitors (e.g., pexidartinib) disrupt LSC-TAM crosstalk, while CAR-M therapy synergizes with phagocytosis-promoting agents. Despite challenges, macrophage-targeted therapies offer transformative potential by remodeling the TME, overcoming resistance, and augmenting immunotherapy. This review outlines mechanistic insights and translational strategies to harness macrophage plasticity for leukemia treatment.
Keywords: CAR-M Therapy; CD47-SIRPα Blockade; CSF-1R Inhibitors; Leukemia Stem Cells; Macrophage Polarization; Tumor Microenvironment.
© 2026. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures
References
Publication types
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
