Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2026 Feb 11.
doi: 10.1007/s13304-026-02523-y. Online ahead of print.

Surgeons' practices and preferences for performing right hemicolectomy for colorectal cancer: results from the SuPrHem survey

Collaborators, Affiliations

Surgeons' practices and preferences for performing right hemicolectomy for colorectal cancer: results from the SuPrHem survey

Pierre-Alain Tokoto et al. Updates Surg. .

Abstract

Surgical techniques for right hemicolectomy (RHC) show considerable heterogeneity. To identify potential areas for improvement and standardization, the objective of this survey was to evaluate and report current practices and preferences among surgeons for performing RHC for colorectal cancer. An international online survey consisting of 31 questions was distributed to general surgeons worldwide to assess their preferred techniques for performing RHC. A total of 368 surgeons from 48 countries responded. Among them, 47% reported performing at least 90% of RHC laparoscopically, while 40% used a robotic approach. The most common dissection technique was a medial-to-lateral vessel-first approach, used by 82.3% of respondents. During laparoscopic procedures, 51.6% of surgeons performed extracorporeal anastomosis, whereas 82.9% of those using a robotic approach favored intracorporeal anastomosis. Fluorescence angiography was routinely used by 39.9% of respondents. The Pfannenstiel incision was the most frequently selected extraction site (46.5%) especially if intracorporeal anastomosis was performed (81.8%). The preferred technique for performing RHC includes a laparoscopic approach with intracorporeal lymph node dissection and extracorporeal anastomosis. Most RHC procedures therefore remain laparoscopy-assisted rather than fully minimally invasive. Robotic surgery appears to facilitate a fully minimally invasive approach including intracorporeal anastomosis.

Keywords: Colorectal cancer; Laparoscopy; MIS; Minimally invasive surgery; Robotic.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors disclose no conflict of interest. Ethics approval: The study did not require ethical clearance.

References

    1. Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy (COST) Study Group (2004) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomized trial. N Engl J Med;350(20):2050–2059.
    1. Lamm R, Mathews SN, Yang J, Park J, Talamini M, Pryor AD, Telem D (2017) Patient acuity and operative technique associated with post-colectomy mortality across New York State: an analysis of 160,792 patients over 20 years. J Gastrointest Surg 21(5):879–884 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Meyer J et al (2024) Robotic versus laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a systematic review of the evidence. J Robot Surg 17(3):2315–2321
    1. Balaphas A et al (2025) Impact of fluorescence angiography on anastomotic leak and complication rate in colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Colorectal Dis 27(10):e70236 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Süsstrunk J et al (2023) Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in colorectal surgery: implementation is still beneficial despite modern surgical and anesthetic care. Langenbecks Arch Surg 409(1):5 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources