Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2026 Feb 17;15(4):e045468.
doi: 10.1161/JAHA.125.045468. Epub 2026 Feb 12.

Long-Term Impact of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy by Left Ventricular Septal Pacing

Affiliations
Free article

Long-Term Impact of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy by Left Ventricular Septal Pacing

Hui-Qiang Wei et al. J Am Heart Assoc. .
Free article

Abstract

Background: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is considered to be an alternative modality to deliver cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). However, left bundle branch pacing and left ventricular septal pacing (LVSP) are characterized as left bundle branch area pacing. The long-term effect of only LVSP in patients with a CRT indication is still unknown.

Methods: Consecutive patients who met the CRT indication were retrospectively included. LVSP was determined during the procedure. New York Heart Association functional class, NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide), and echocardiographic and pacing parameters were assessed at implant and follow-up visit.

Results: A total of 40 consecutive patients with successful LVSP were included for analysis with a mean follow-up period of 29.4±16.2 months. The QRS complex in lead V1 during LVSP featured a QS pattern (52.5%), Qr/qR pattern (30%), or rsR pattern (17.5%). LVSP significantly shortened QRS duration (from baseline 172.5±16.8 to 135.3±19.8 ms, P<0.001) with V6 R-wave peak time of 96.4±9.6 ms. Left ventricular ejection fraction mproved from 26.7±7.4% at baseline to 38.8±16.1% (P<0.001) and a decrease in the LV end-diastolic diameter (67.9±9.8 versus 59.7±10.4 mm; P<0.001) during the follow-up. Echocardiographic response and superresponse were observed in 52.5% and 22.5% of patients, respectively. New York Heart Association functional class improved from 2.7±0.4 at baseline to 1.9±0.6 (P<0.01) and NT-proBNP concentration decreased significantly (4544±975 versus 2353±1225 pg/mL; P<0.001). No procedure-related complications occurred during the implantation procedure.

Conclusions: LVSP is clinically feasible and safe in patients undergoing CRT. LVSP appears to be an alternative CRT pacing strategy with suboptimal ventricular resynchronization.

Keywords: biventricular pacing; cardiac resynchronization therapy; left bundle branch area pacing; left bundle branch pacing; left ventricular septal pacing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Substances

LinkOut - more resources