Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2026 Feb 11;16(2):e73095.
doi: 10.1002/ece3.73095. eCollection 2026 Feb.

Vocalization Characteristics of the Indo-Pacific Humpback Dolphins (Sousa chinensis) in Xiamen Bay With Insights on Regional Differences

Affiliations

Vocalization Characteristics of the Indo-Pacific Humpback Dolphins (Sousa chinensis) in Xiamen Bay With Insights on Regional Differences

Xuming Peng et al. Ecol Evol. .

Abstract

Although whistles and high-frequency clicks of Indo-Pacific humpback dolphins (Sousa chinensis) had been documented in many wild populations, the small population inhabiting Xiamen Bay has received limited attention. Monthly surveys from 2021 to 2024 recorded a total of 107 whistles and 33,038 high-quality clicks. Whistles exhibited mean minimum and maximum frequencies of 5.2 ± 2.2 kHz and 7.5 ± 2.7 kHz, respectively, with a mean duration of 247.6 ± 174.2 ms. Clicks had a peak frequency of 86.4 ± 19.5 kHz, a -3 dB bandwidth of 53.3 ± 14.6 kHz, and a duration of 22.3 ± 6.4 μs. Statistically, clicks from dolphins in the West sub-region had a higher mean peak frequency, broader -3 dB bandwidth, and shorter duration than those from the East sub-region, suggesting adaptations to local environmental conditions and vessel noise. No significant difference was observed in whistles between the two communities. These findings indicated a potential risk of population subdivision for the Xiamen Bay population, underscoring the urgency of protective measures that sustain connectivity and reduce anthropogenic pressures.

Keywords: Indo‐Pacific humpback dolphins; acoustic characteristics; anthropogenic noise; vessel traffic; vocalizations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
(a) An overall view of the location of the study site in a regional context. (b) Enlarged map of the study location. (c) Diagram of the on‐site survey recording. (d) Indo‐Pacific humpback dolphins encountered during a boat‐based survey.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
(a) The spectrogram of an example click train. (b) The time series of a click extracted from the red box in (a) and (c) its corresponding spectra.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
The spectrograms of examples of six types of whistles. (a) Constant‐frequency whistle. (b) Concave whistle. (c) Convex whistle. (d) Sinusoidal whistle. (e) Downsweep whistle. (f) Upsweep whistle.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
The effective recording minutes for 45 surveys.
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Pie chart of the proportion of different types of whistles for the total, East and West sub‐regions, respectively.
FIGURE 6
FIGURE 6
Comparison box plots of peak frequency, duration, −3 dB bandwidth and peak‐to‐peak sound pressure level for clicks between the East and West groups.
FIGURE 7
FIGURE 7
Comparison box plots of beginning frequency, ending frequency, duration, minimum frequency, maximum frequency, and frequency range for whistles recorded in the East and West sub‐regions.
FIGURE 8
FIGURE 8
Time series of the vessel density variation from June 2021 to September 2024 in the East and West sub‐regions. The vessel traffic data were obtained from Global Maritime Traffic.

References

    1. Akamatsu, T. , Wang D., Nakamura K., and Wang K.. 1998. “Echolocation Range of Captive and Free‐Ranging Baiji (<styled-content style="fixed-case"> Lipotes vexillifer </styled-content>), Finless Porpoise (<styled-content style="fixed-case"> Neophocaena phocaenoides </styled-content>), and Bottlenose Dolphin (<styled-content style="fixed-case"> Tursiops truncatus </styled-content>).” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 104: 2511–2516. 10.1121/1.423757. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Amorim, M. C. P. , and Hawkins A. D.. 2000. “Growling for Food: Acoustic Emissions During Competitive Feeding of the Streaked Gurnard.” Journal of Fish Biology 57: 895–907. 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2000.tb02200.x. - DOI
    1. Andreas, J. , Beguš G., Bronstein M. M., et al. 2022. “Toward Understanding the Communication in Sperm Whales.” iScience 25: 104393. 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104393. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Au, W. W. L. 1993. The Sonar of Dolphins. Springer New York.
    1. Au, W. W. L. , and Banks K.. 1998. “The Acoustics of the Snapping Shrimp Synalpheus parneomeris in Kaneohe Bay.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 103: 41–47. 10.1121/1.423234. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources