Real-Life Safety of Japanese Cedar Pollen Sublingual Immunotherapy Tablets: A Post-Marketing Survey
- PMID: 41688412
- PMCID: PMC12904777
- DOI: 10.1002/clt2.70157
Real-Life Safety of Japanese Cedar Pollen Sublingual Immunotherapy Tablets: A Post-Marketing Survey
Abstract
Background: Japanese cedar (JC) pollen sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT)-tablets (5000 Japanese allergy units [JAU]) are licensed for the treatment of JC-pollinosis with no age restriction on the basis of the results of a 5-year clinical trial. However, there have been no large-scale surveys of 5000 JAU in an actual clinical setting.
Methods: This was a multicenter observational prospective study. We assessed the safety and effectiveness of the long-term use of 5000 JAU in patients with JC-pollinosis, with an observation period of two seasons of JC pollen dispersal, at clinical sites in Japan.
Results: Our safety analysis included 516 patients and the effectiveness analysis included 469 patients. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) occurred in 68 patients (13.18%) and mainly comprised administration site-related events that occurred during the early phase of administration. Treatment discontinuation due to ADRs occurred in 18 patients (3.49%). No deaths, anaphylactic shock, or serious ADRs occurred. Regarding effectiveness, the severity of JC-pollinosis was rated as "almost asymptomatic + mild" in 82.19% of patients in Season 1 and 92.58% in Season 2. Quality of life was rated as "score 0 (Fine) + 1" in 75.83% of patients in Season 1 and 86.09% in Season 2. Overall improvement was rated as "improved + slightly improved" in 95.68% of patients in Season 1 and 96.38% in Season 2 following the initiation of JC pollen SLIT-tablets. Nasal and ocular symptom scores also decreased with increasing treatment duration. Treatment continuation rates were 89.53% in Season 1 and 78.29% in Season 2.
Conclusion: The JC pollen SLIT-tablets appear to be safe and effective in an actual clinical setting during two seasons. No new safety or effectiveness issues were identified, and no additional safety or effectiveness precautions were required.
Keywords: Japanese cedar pollen; SLIT; allergic rhinitis; post‐marketing surveillance; sublingual immunotherapy tablets.
© 2026 Torii Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. Clinical and Translational Allergy published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology.
Conflict of interest statement
M.G. has received honoraria from Torii, Taiho, Hisamitsu, Meiji Seika Pharma, and Novartis. Y.M., T.A., N.K., E.H., and N.N. are employees of Torii Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.
Figures
References
-
- Matsubara A., Sakashita M., Gotoh M., et al., “Epidemiological Survey of Allergic Rhinitis in Japan 2019,” Journal of Otolaryngology of Japan 123, no. 6 (2020): 485–490, 10.3950/jibiinkoka.123.485. - DOI
-
- Durham S. R., Emminger W., Kapp A., et al., “SQ‐Standardized Sublingual Grass Immunotherapy: Confirmation of Disease Modification 2 Years After 3 Years of Treatment in a Randomized Trial,” Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 129, no. 3 (2012): 717–725, 10.1016/j.jaci.2011.12.973. - DOI - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
