Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2026 Feb 14.
doi: 10.1186/s40337-026-01547-4. Online ahead of print.

Food preference and behavioural choice across the eating disorder and body weight spectrum

K N Eichin  1   2 , A-K Arend  3 , J Reichenberger  3 , U Voderholzer  4   5 , J Blechert  3
Affiliations
Free article

Food preference and behavioural choice across the eating disorder and body weight spectrum

K N Eichin et al. J Eat Disord. .
Free article

Abstract

Background: Eating disorders (EDs) such as Anorexia Nervosa (AN), Bulimia Nervosa (BN), and Binge-Eating Disorder (BED) share overlapping symptoms, risk factors, and maintenance mechanisms, yet differ in their behavioural manifestations. This study aimed to investigate binary food choice behaviour across EDs and weight groups, including healthy controls with normal weight, overweight and obesity in a controlled laboratory setting.

Methods: N = 189 individuals with AN (n = 40), BN (n = 29), BED (n = 24) as well as controls without eating disorders with normal weight (HC-NW, n = 57), overweight (HC-OW, n = 18) and obesity (HC-OB, n = 21) made 153 binary food choices while decision times were recorded. Participants also rated foods on liking and calorie content. The number of calories in chosen foods, the relationship between calorie content and liking ratings and decision times were analysed. We further explored the roles of eating styles, BMI and ED symptoms in food choice.

Results: Individuals with AN chose less calories, liked lower-calorie foods more and made faster decisions, especially for lower-calorie options compared to HC-NW. The other groups did not differ from HC-NW in food choice or liking, but BN - and to a lesser degree HC-OB and HC-OW - made faster food choices. External eating positively predicted higher-calorie choices.

Conclusion: This study underscores the distinctiveness of AN in food choice behaviour and the need for transdiagnostic approaches to understand shared and unique mechanisms across EDs and weight groups. Future research should explore longitudinal changes in food choice processes and integrate contextual and emotional factors to better capture the complexity of eating behaviours.

Keywords: Anorexia nervosa; Binge eating disorder; Bulimia nervosa; Choice processes; Eating disorder spectrum; Food choice; Food preferences; Obesity; Overweight; Reaction times.

Plain language summary

This study looked at how people with different eating disorders (Anorexia Nervosa, Bulimia Nervosa, and Binge-Eating Disorder) and different body weights (normal weight, overweight, and obesity) make food choices. Participants completed a computer-based task in which they chose between pairs of foods, rated how much they liked them, and estimated their calorie content. It was also measured how quickly they made the decisions. The results showed that people with Anorexia Nervosa chose lower-calorie foods more often, liked them more, and made faster decisions when they chose them compared with people of normal weight who did not have eating disorders. Other groups, including those with Bulimia Nervosa, overweight, or obesity, did not differ in the foods they liked but made faster decisions overall. People who tended to eat in response to external cues (e.g., seeing food) were more likely to choose higher-calorie options. The study highlights how food choices are different for people with Anorexia Nervosa and suggests that eating disorders share some similarities but also have unique traits. We recommend studying how food choices change over time and considering emotional and situational factors to better understand eating behaviours.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The study was approved by the University of Salzburg Ethics committee and the University of Munich medical review board. All participants gave their informed consent to participate. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

References

    1. Hilbert A, Pike KM, Goldschmidt AB, Wilfley DE, Fairburn CG, Dohm FA, et al. Risk factors across the eating disorders. Psychiatry Res. 2014;220(1):500–6.
    1. Fairburn CG, Cooper Z, Shafran R. Cognitive behaviour therapy for eating disorders: a transdiagnostic theory and treatment. Behav Res Ther. 2003;41(5):509–28.
    1. Hübel C, Abdulkadir M, Herle M, Loos RJF, Breen G, Bulik CM, et al. One size does not fit all. Genomics differentiates among anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, and binge-eating disorder. Int J Eat Disord. 2021;54(5):785–93.
    1. Santos I, Sniehotta FF, Marques MM, Carraça EV, Teixeira PJ. Prevalence of personal weight control attempts in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2017;18(1):32–50.
    1. Stewart TM, Martin CK, Williamson DA. The complicated relationship between Dieting, dietary Restraint, caloric Restriction, and eating disorders: is a shift in public health messaging warranted? Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(1):491.

LinkOut - more resources