Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2026 Jan 24:83:1-7.
doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2026.01.005. Online ahead of print.

A Pilot Study Evaluating Erector Spinae Block Versus Saline For Emergency Department Patients With Ureterolithiasis

Michael Secko  1 , Daniel D Singer  2 , Gilbert Tetteh  3 , Matthew Vitale  4 , Benjamin Fombonne  2 , Kristopher Bianconi  2 , Rafael Fernandes  2 , Andrea Gowie  2 , Adam J Singer  5
Affiliations

A Pilot Study Evaluating Erector Spinae Block Versus Saline For Emergency Department Patients With Ureterolithiasis

Michael Secko et al. J Emerg Med. .

Abstract

Background: Ureterolithiasis is a major cause of severe flank pain in the Emergency Department (ED). Given the disadvantages of opioids, alternative yet effective therapies for ureterolithiasis are sorely needed.

Objectives: To determine the feasibility and analgesic efficacy of an erector spinae plane block (ESPB) with ropivacaine 0.5% compared with normal saline (NS) in patients with ureterolithiasis.

Methods: We conducted a single-blinded, randomized clinical trial, on a convenience sample of adult ED patients with ureteral stones with a numeric pain score of > 4. Baseline characteristics were recorded, and patients were randomly allocated to an ESPB using 20 mL ropivacaine 0.5% or NS. Pain scores were recorded at 10, 20, 40, and 60 minutes. Between-group pain scores were compared with a Mann Whitney U test and repeated measures analysis of variance.

Results: The study included 24 patients, 12 in each of the study groups. Mean (SD) age was 45.6 (12.8) years, 54% were male. Baseline pain scores were similar in both groups. Median (IQR) pain scores at 60 minutes were 1 (0-3.7) and 4 (1.2-5) in patients randomized to ropivacaine and NS, respectively (p = 0.11). Patient satisfaction scores and time to discharge were similar in both groups.

Conclusions: In this pilot study of ED patients with ureterolithiasis performance of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing ESPB with ropivacaine and NS was feasible and showed clinically significant differences but not statistically significant between-group differences in pain scores. The study also raises the possibility that fascial plane injection of NS may have analgesic benefit as well.

Keywords: Analgesia; Emergency department; Erector spinae plane block; Regional anesthesia; Ultrasound; Ureterolithiasis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of competing interest We are pleased to submit our manuscript entitled “A Pilot Study Evaluating Erector Spinae Block versus Saline for ED Patients with Ureterolithiasis” for consideration as Brief Report in Journal of Emergency Medicine. The work described in this manuscript has not been published previously except in the form of an abstract at ACEP 2024. This manuscript as submitted, or its essence in another version, is not under consideration for publication elsewhere while under consideration by Journal of Emergency Medicine. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript and have no conflicts of interest to disclose. We have complied with our institutional ethical guidelines and obtained IRB approval and informed consent for all participants. Thank you for considering our work. If accepted, the article will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any other language, including electronically, without the written consent of the copyright-holder.

LinkOut - more resources