Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2026 Mar 1;132(5):e70334.
doi: 10.1002/cncr.70334.

Efficacy of a sexual quality of life intervention for couples facing metastatic breast cancer: Results of a randomized controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Efficacy of a sexual quality of life intervention for couples facing metastatic breast cancer: Results of a randomized controlled trial

Jennifer B Reese et al. Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: Patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) often report severe, long-standing concerns with their sexual quality of life (QOL), yet interventions for this population are scarce. This study evaluated the efficacy of a couple-based sexual QOL intervention adapted for MBC couples in a randomized controlled trial.

Methods: Fifty-five female MBC patients reporting sexual concerns and their intimate partners (N = 110 participants) were randomized to Adapted Intimacy Enhancement (AIE), a four-session videoconference intervention providing education and skills training for coping with sexual/intimacy concerns, or Enhanced Care-As-Usual (ECAU; informational booklet). Outcomes (measured at baseline, post-intervention, and 6-month follow-up) included patients' sexual outcomes (sexual function/distress/self-efficacy; primary), patients' psychosocial outcomes (sexual communication, relationship intimacy, and psychological distress; secondary), and similar partner outcomes (secondary). Mixed linear regression models assessed intervention effects on outcomes at follow-ups; psychosocial outcomes were analyzed using dyadic analyses. Effect sizes (Cohen's d) were calculated.

Results: Compared to ECAU, patients in AIE reported greater improvements in overall sexual function (p = .018), desire (p = .007), and sexual distress (p = .046) at 6 months, and in sexual satisfaction at both post-intervention (p = .02) and 6 months (p < .001). Partners in AIE reported greater improvements in sexual distress (p = .006), sexual self-efficacy (p = .008), sexual communication (p = .004), and relationship intimacy (p = .01) at 6 months. Effects were largest for patient sexual satisfaction and partner sexual distress at 6 months.

Conclusions: Compared to a detailed informational booklet on sex/intimacy, the couple-based AIE intervention yielded long-term benefits for MBC patients' sexual outcomes and partners' sexual distress and psychosocial outcomes. Future research should identify intervention mediators and optimal dissemination methods.

Keywords: breast cancer; dyadic coping; intimacy; randomized controlled trial; sexual dysfunction; videoconference intervention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosure: The authors declare that they have no relevant conflicts of interest to report.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study Flow Diagram (CONSORT) Note: A half-completed follow-up survey represents instances where half of a couple completed an assessment (e.g., 0.5 post-intervention survey completed indicates only the patient completed the survey and the partner did not).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Trajectories of Change in Scores on by Role (patient vs. partner) and Study Arm (AIE vs. ECAU) for (a) Self-Efficacy for Coping with Sexual Concerns, (b) Sexual Communication, and (c) Relationship Intimacy Note: Three-way interactions for depressive symptoms (PHQ-9) and anxiety symptoms (GAD-7) were not statistically significant and thus the graphs for these outcomes are not shown.

References

    1. Gallicchio L, Devasia TP, Tonorezos E, Mollica MA,Mariotto A. Estimation of the Number of Individuals Living With Metastatic Cancer in the United States. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2022;114:1476–1483. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bober SL,Sanchez Varela V. Sexuality in Adult Cancer Survivors: Challenges and Intervention. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:3712–3719. - PubMed
    1. Jahan N, Cathcart-Rake E, Vierkant RA, et al. Sexual Dysfunction in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer. Clin Breast Cancer. 2024;24:72–78.e74. - PubMed
    1. Buzaglo JS, Miller MF, Andersen BL, Longacre M,Robinson PA. Sexual morbidity and unmet needs among members of a metastatic breast cancer registry. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:9585–9585.
    1. Djohan R, Gage E, Gatherwright J, et al. Patient Satisfaction following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction: An 8-Year Outcome Study Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125:818–829 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources