Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2026 Feb 5:16:1724255.
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2026.1724255. eCollection 2026.

Health-related quality of life scores of ultralow rectal cancer patients after conformal sphincter preservation operation compared to newly derived preoperative EORTC QLQ-C30, CR38 reference values and EORTC QLQ-C30 norm

Affiliations

Health-related quality of life scores of ultralow rectal cancer patients after conformal sphincter preservation operation compared to newly derived preoperative EORTC QLQ-C30, CR38 reference values and EORTC QLQ-C30 norm

Hai-Bo Ding et al. Front Oncol. .

Abstract

Background: Postoperative quality of life (Post-QoL) is the key to measuring the effectiveness of sphincter-preserving operation such as Conformal sphincter preservation operation (CSPO) for ultralow rectal cancer. This study aimed to establish preoperative QoL (Pre-QoL) reference values for rectal cancer patients and compare them with post-CSPO QoL to highlight CSPO's benefits in preserving QoL.

Methods: Clinical baseline data and Post-QoL data (EORTC QLQ-C30, CR38) from ultralow rectal cancer patients who underwent CSPO at Shanghai Changhai Hospital from August 2011 to April 2020 were retrospectively collected, and Pre-QoL reference values for rectal cancer patients were extracted through a literature review. The Post-QoL of CSPO were compared with the newly derived Pre-QoL reference values and the norm in the EORTC QLQ-C30 reference value manual.

Results: Compared with the newly derived preoperative C30 reference value, the preoperative C30 norm for colorectal cancer (CRC) and the general population, the Post-QoL of CSPO can exceed the preoperative level and reach a similar level to general population. Compared with the gender, and stage subgroups of the preoperative C30 norm for CRC, the Post-QoL of CSPO showed that male patients benefited more, while patients stage III-IV had limited benefits compared to other subgroups. Compared with the newly derived preoperative CR38 reference value, the Post-QoL of CSPO is comparable to that before surgery, but the sexual function and sexual enjoyment dimensions are significantly lower than those before surgery.

Conclusions: The Long-term QoL after CSPO can exceed the preoperative level and reach a similar level to general population. However, postoperative diarrhea symptoms and decreased sexual function and enjoyment should be taken seriously and measures should be actively taken to promote recovery. Patients stage III-IV had limited benefits compared to other subgroups, and the selection and surgical procedures need to be more cautious.

Keywords: EORTC QLQ-C30; EORTC QLQ-CR38; conformal sphincter preservation operation; health-related quality of life; reference values; ultra-low rectal cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The literature screening flow chart of EORTC QLQ-C30.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The literature screening flow chart of EORTC QLQ-CR38.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Comparison of postoperative C30 score of CSPO with newly derived preoperative C30 reference value and C30 norm. * indicates a significant difference and a difference 5, ** indicates a significant difference and a difference 10.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Comparison of gender subgroups between the CSPO postoperative C30 score and preoperative C30 norm in patients with CRC. * indicates a significant difference and a difference 5, ** indicates a significant difference and a difference 10.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Comparison of stage subgroups between the CSPO postoperative C30 score and preoperative C30 norm in patients with CRC. * indicates a significant difference and a difference 5, ** indicates a significant difference and a difference 10.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Comparison between the CSPO postoperative CR38 score and the newly derived preoperative CR38 reference value. ** indicates a significant difference and a difference 10, *** indicates a significant difference and a difference 20.

References

    1. Saito N, Ito M, Kobayashi A, Nishizawa Y, Kojima M, Nishizawa Y, et al. Long-term outcomes after intersphincteric resection for low-lying rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. (2014) 21:3608–15. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-3762-y, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sun G, Lou Z, Zhang H, Yu GY, Zheng K, Gao XH, et al. Retrospective study of the functional and oncological outcomes of conformal sphincter preservation operation in the treatment of very low rectal cancer. Tech Coloproctol. (2020) 24:1025–34. doi: 10.1007/s10151-020-02229-2, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. São Julião GP, Habr-Gama A, Vailati BB, Araujo SEA, Fernandez LM, Perez RO. New strategies in rectal cancer. Surg Clinics North America. (2017) 97:587–604. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2017.01.008, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bascoul-Mollevi C, Gourgou S, Borg C, Etienne P-L, Rio E, Rullier E, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with FOLFIRINOX and preoperative chemoradiotherapy for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (UNICANCER PRODIGE 23): Health-related quality of life longitudinal analysis. Eur J Cancer. (2023) 186:151–65. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.03.021, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Braun DP, Gupta D, Grutsch JF, Staren ED. Can changes in health related quality of life scores predict survival in stages III and IV colorectal cancer? Health Qual Life Outcomes. (2011) 9:62. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-9-62, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources