Future-proofing the mixing zone concept in water resources management: an industrial perspective
- PMID: 41731234
- DOI: 10.1007/s11356-026-37532-2
Future-proofing the mixing zone concept in water resources management: an industrial perspective
Abstract
Mixing zones allow limited exceedances of Environmental Quality Standards within defined areas of receiving waters, yet their implementation across Europe remains uneven and increasingly scrutinised. This study evaluates how environmental change, regulatory evolution, and industrial water-use practices may influence the future viability of mixing zones. A cross-European assessment was conducted using (i) regulatory and technical guidance, (ii) a survey of 22 fuel manufacturing facilities in 14 countries, and (iii) CORMIX near-field modelling to test sensitivity to effluent and ambient parameters. Results revealed substantial variability in permitting conditions, discharge limits, and review frequencies. Only four facilities used mixing zones, though several anticipated future reliance as concentration-based criteria tighten. Modelling demonstrated that effluent density, ambient density, flow regimes, and temperature strongly affected mixing zone dimensions and dilution, with climate change and water reuse practices requiring careful considerations. These findings highlight the need for harmonised guidance, incorporation of mass-loading considerations, and climate-resilient assessment methods to ensure the long-term applicability of mixing zones in (industrial) wastewater management.
Keywords: CORMIX; Effluent; Fuel manufacturing; Refinery; Surface water; Wastewater.
© 2026. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval: This study did not involve any procedures requiring formal ethical review. The survey was designed to collect anonymised operational information related to effluent discharge permits and mixing zones. All participants were informed of the purpose and voluntary nature of the study. Clinical trial number: not applicable. Consent to participate: Receivers of the survey were informed about the purpose of the survey, and that participation was voluntary. Completion of the survey was taken as implied consent to participate. Consent for publication: Participants were made aware that the anonymised results of the survey would be used for publication. No personally identifiable information has been collected or disclosed. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
References
-
- Abily M, Acuña V, Gernjak W, Rodríguez-Roda I, Poch M, Corominas L (2021) Climate change impact on EU rivers’ dilution capacity and ecological status. Water Res 199:117166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2021.117166 - DOI
-
- Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council (ANZECC) (2010) Australian and New Zealand guidelines for fresh and marine water quality. https://www.waterquality.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/anzecc-arm... . Accessed 09 December 2025
-
- Barthe P, Chaugny M, Roudier S, Delgado Sancho L (2015) Best available techniques (BAT) reference document for the refining of mineral oil and gas. Publications Office of the European Union. https://eippcb.jrc.ec.europa.eu/sites/default/files/2019-11/REF_BREF_201... . Accessed 30 April 2024
-
- Bleninger T, Jirka GH (2011) Mixing zone regulation for effluent discharges into EU waters. Water Manag 164:387–396. https://doi.org/10.1680/wama.900037 - DOI
-
- Campos CJA, Morrisey DJ, Paul B (2022) Principles and technical application of mixing zones for wastewater discharges to freshwater and marine environments. Water 14:1201. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14081201 - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
