Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2026 Feb 24;26(1):361.
doi: 10.1186/s12909-026-08785-9.

The role of digital teaching methods in supporting practical skills training in the academic training of health professions - a scoping review

Affiliations

The role of digital teaching methods in supporting practical skills training in the academic training of health professions - a scoping review

Stamer Tjorven et al. BMC Med Educ. .

Abstract

Background: Digital teaching methods are established for imparting theoretical knowledge in the training of health professions. While digital formats are increasingly used in education, evidence on their capacity to teach practical and hands-on skills remains limited. It is unclear to what extent digital teaching methods can support the training of practical skills. This scoping review aimed to identify the digital teaching methods used to teach practical skills in the academic training of health professions and to offer an initial evaluation of their effectiveness.

Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed in June 2023 using the PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Web of Science Core Collection and CINAHL databases. An update of this initial search was performed in April 2025. Original studies on the digital teaching of practical skills in undergraduate academic training for health professions, published in German or English, were included. The studies were analyzed with regard to teaching methods, areas of application, authors and year, intervention used, outcomes and results.

Results: Out of 2,544 records, 292 studies were included. Interventions comprised simulators (n = 65), blended/hybrid teaching methods (n = 55), virtual reality (n = 48), e-learning platforms (n = 36), video-based teaching formats (n = 19), telecommunication tools (n = 18), mobile applications (n = 13), robotic simulators (n = 10), serious games or gamified learning (n = 10), specialized tools (n = 6), interactive learning systems (n = 6) and augmented reality (n = 6).

75% of the studies focused on medical education, followed by student training in nursing (18%) and physiotherapy (3%). The most common study designs were randomized controlled trials (42%), quasi-experimental designs (34%) and quantitative-descriptive designs (12%). Learning outcomes were predominantly assessed through knowledge tests, practical examinations (e.g., OSCEs) and participants' self-assessments. Across the included studies, most digital teaching methods demonstrated positive effects on the acquisition of practical skills, particularly simulation-based, VR-supported or otherwise interactive formats. The magnitude and consistency of these effects varied substantially across disciplines and study designs.

Conclusions: Digital teaching methods offer promising approaches to support the training of practical skills, with interactive, simulation-based, and VR-supported formats showing particularly positive effects. Nevertheless, longitudinal studies examining the retention of practical skills over time remain scarce. Digital teaching methods should be specifically tailored to the practical skills being taught, making use of available resources.

Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-026-08785-9.

Keywords: Academic training; Digital teaching methods; Health education; Practical skills; Scoping review; Undergraduate.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flow diagram
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Number of publications per year
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Study designs of the included studies
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Health professions addressed in the included studies
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Digital interventions used in the included studies

References

    1. Vogel D, Harendza S. Basic practical skills teaching and learning in undergraduate medical education - a review on methodological evidence. GMS J Med Educ. 2016;33(4):Doc64. 10.3205/zma001063. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on the Health Professions Education Summit. In: Greiner AC, Knebel E, editors. Health professions education: A Bridge to quality. National Academies Press (US); 2003. - PubMed
    1. Roberts F, Cooper K. Effectiveness of high fidelity simulation versus low fidelity simulation on practical/clinical skill development in pre-registration physiotherapy students: a systematic review. JBI Database Syst Rev Implement Rep. 2019;17(6):1229–55. 10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003931. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Allery L. Teach practical skills. Education for primary care : an official publication of the Association of Course Organisers, National Association of GP Tutors, World Organisation of Family Doctors. 2009;20(1):58–60. 10.1080/14739879.2009.11493762. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gregersen AG, Hansen MT, Brynhildsen SEA, Grøndahl VA, Leonardsen AC. Students’ perspectives on learning practical nursing skills: a focus group study in Norway. Nurs Res Pract. 2021;2021:8870394. 10.1155/2021/8870394. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources