Vestibular, Oculomotor, and Head Repositioning Accuracy Deficits after Sport-Related Concussion: Implications for Subsequent Injury Risk
- PMID: 41736200
- DOI: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000001429
Vestibular, Oculomotor, and Head Repositioning Accuracy Deficits after Sport-Related Concussion: Implications for Subsequent Injury Risk
Abstract
Objective: After concussion, athletes have an increased risk of subsequent injuries upon return to play (RTP) compared with nonconcussed peers. Cervical spine, vestibular, and oculomotor deficits have been observed after concussion, but associations with subsequent injuries have not been established. Our objective was to investigate whether head repositioning accuracy (HRA) and vestibular/oculomotor symptoms were associated with postconcussion injuries.
Design: Prospective cohort.
Setting: Academic research laboratory.
Participants: Adolescent athletes ages 13 to 18 years after concussion.
Independent variables: HRA error, vestibular/oculomotor symptoms.
Main outcome measures: We evaluated athletes at RTP clearance and monitored injury incidence for 1 year through monthly surveys. At RTP, we assessed HRA (outcome: mean HRA error across 12 trials) and the visiovestibular examination (VVE; outcome: number of subtests that provoked symptoms) to assess vestibular/oculomotor symptoms. We used Cox proportional hazards regression models to assess hazard of subsequent injury, adjusting for RTP clearance time and prior concussion/musculoskeletal injury.
Results: Forty-five participants were included (age = 15.8 ± 1.3 years, 58% female). Nineteen athletes reported 24 injuries during the 1-year follow-up. After adjusting for RTP clearance and prior concussion/musculoskeletal injury, greater HRA error was associated with higher hazard of subsequent injury (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.46; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-2.08; P = 0.03); VVE symptom provocation was not (HR: 0.87; 95% CI, 0.64-1.19; P = 0.39).
Conclusions: Worse HRA may be associated with higher hazard of postconcussion injury. HRA is a clinically feasible assessment that may identify some individuals with increased injury risk who may benefit from further evaluation/rehabilitation before RTP.
Keywords: cervical spine joint position error; injuries; return to play; sports.
Copyright © 2026 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
References
-
- Harmon KG, Clugston JR, Dec K, et al. American Medical Society for Sports Medicine position statement on concussion in sport. Br J Sports Med. 2019;53:213–225.
-
- Patricios JS, Schneider KJ, Dvorak J, et al. Consensus statement on concussion in sport: the 6th International Conference on Concussion in Sport–Amsterdam, October 2022. Br J Sports Med. 2023;57:695–711.
-
- Echemendia RJ, Meeuwisse W, McCrory P, et al. The sport concussion assessment tool 5th edition (SCAT5): background and rationale. Br J Sports Med. 2017;51:848–850.
-
- Echemendia RJ, Brett BL, Broglio S, et al. Sport concussion assessment toolTM – 6 (SCAT6). Br J Sports Med. 2023;57:622–631.
-
- Patricios JS, Davis GA, Ahmed OH, et al. Introducing the sport concussion office assessment tool 6 (SCOAT6). Br J Sports Med. 2023;57:648–650.
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
