Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2026 Feb 25.
doi: 10.1007/s13280-025-02331-5. Online ahead of print.

Freshwater biodiversity in a rapidly changing Arctic: An expert horizon scan of key research questions

Affiliations
Review

Freshwater biodiversity in a rapidly changing Arctic: An expert horizon scan of key research questions

Joseph M Culp et al. Ambio. .

Abstract

Arctic freshwater biodiversity is rapidly changing due to climate warming, resource extraction, infrastructure development, and landscape transformation. To improve understanding, predict future responses, and inform policy formulation, research needs must be clearly identified. Using a horizon scan survey, Arctic freshwater experts from government, international agencies, and Indigenous Peoples identified 77 biodiversity research questions with 17 highlighted as most important for near term assessment. These questions span nine thematic categories: biodiversity and taxonomic challenges, hydrological change, productivity and food webs, ecosystem connectivity, methods, monitoring and assessment, permafrost change, winter ecology, anthropogenic development, and Indigenous Knowledge. Climate change emerged as the major driver among all categories and research questions. A key priority identified was the urgent need for long-term, harmonized monitoring programs among Arctic countries. Multiple knowledge gaps detected suggest that circumpolar research collaborations are required to tackle these issues.

Keywords: Circumpolar research collaboration; Climate warming; Impacts of human development; Long-term monitoring; Subsistence fisheries.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

    1. Alvarez, J., D. Yumashev, and G. Whiteman. 2020. A framework for assessing the economic impacts of Arctic change. Ambio 49: 407–418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-019-01211-z . - DOI
    1. Ask, J., J. Karlsson, L. Persson, P. Ask, P. Byström, and M. Jansson. 2009. Terrestrial organic matter and light penetration: Effects on bacterial and primary production in lakes. Limnology and Oceanography 54: 2034–2040. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2009.54.6.2034 . - DOI
    1. Barry, T., T. Christensen, C. Behe, C. Coon, J. M. Culp, S. Fletcher, M. Gill, W. Goedkoop, et al. 2023. Development of a multi-scale monitoring programme: Approaches for the Arctic and lessons learnt from the Circumpolar Biodiversity Monitoring Programme (CBMP) 2002–2022. Frontiers in Conservation Science 4: 1326672. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcosc.2023.1220521 . - DOI
    1. Best, A., R. Czarnecki, T. Koivurova, and E. Molenaar. 2009. Comparative policy analyses: U.S., EU and transatlantic Arctic policy. Berlin, Germany: Ecologic Institute.
    1. Birk, S., D. Chapman, L. Carvalho, B. M. Spears, H. E. Andersen, C. Argillier, S. Auer, A. Baattrup-Pedersen, et al. 2020. Impacts of multiple stressors on freshwater biota across spatial scales and ecosystems. Nature Ecology and Evolution 4: 1060–1068. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-1216-4 . - DOI

LinkOut - more resources