A New Normative Zone for Acetabular Anteversion Positioning in ASD Patients
- PMID: 41761562
- DOI: 10.1002/jor.70171
A New Normative Zone for Acetabular Anteversion Positioning in ASD Patients
Abstract
Adult spinal deformity patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty experience higher hip dislocation rates than those with normal spinal alignment. The traditional Lewinnek safe zone does not account for spinopelvic variation such as pelvic retroversion. To address this, three patient-specific normative zones for acetabular anteversion were defined. A multicenter retrospective analysis of 146 adult spinal deformity patients and 47 asymptomatic controls was performed using three-dimensional biplanar radiograph reconstructions to measure spinopelvic alignment and acetabular orientation. Normative Zone 1, for patients not undergoing spinal realignment, was delineated by the 95% confidence interval limits: minimum anteversion = 0.3182 × pelvic tilt +2.947 and maximum anteversion = 0.3317 × pelvic tilt +25.823. Normative Zone 2, for patients following spinal realignment, was based on pelvic incidence: minimum anteversion = 0.0682 × pelvic incidence +9.7749 and maximum anteversion = 0.0698 × pelvic incidence +21.5218. Normative Zone 3, intended for cases with uncertain spinal correction plans, was defined as the intersection of Zones 1 and 2, yielding a narrower target anteversion range. These zones enable patient-specific cup placement that accounts for existing or planned spinal alignment, with the potential to reduce dislocation risk. Clinical Significance: This study provides acetabular cup orientation tailored to each patient's spinopelvic alignment and surgical plan, potentially reducing dislocation rates in spinal malalignment patients.
Keywords: Lewinnek zone; acetabular anteversion; adult spinal deformity; dislocation; total hip arthroplasty.
© 2026 Orthopaedic Research Society.
References
-
- A. Assi, G. Rebeyrat, R. El Rachkidi, et al., “ASD With High Pelvic Retroversion Develop Changes in Their Acetabular Orientation During Walking,” Brain and Spine 3 (2023): 101752.
-
- A. J. Buckland, J. Vigdorchik, F. J. Schwab, et al., “Acetabular Anteversion Changes Due to Spinal Deformity Correction: Bridging the Gap Between Hip and Spine Surgeons,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery‐American Volume 97 (2015): 1913–1920.
-
- A. Di Martino, G. Geraci, M. Brunello, et al., “Hip‐Spine Relationship: Clinical Evidence and Biomechanical Issues,” Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 144 (2024): 1821–1833.
-
- N. Eftekhary, A. Shimmin, J. Y. Lazennec, et al., “A Systematic Approach to the Hip‐Spine Relationship and Its Applications to Total Hip Arthroplasty,” Bone & Joint Journal 101–B (2019): 808–816.
-
- D. J. Kress, P. M. Morgan, D. C. Thomas, J. J. Haselhuhn, and D. W. Polly, “Prevalence of Total Joint Arthroplasty in the Adult Spine Deformity Population,” Spine Deformity 12 (2024): 1421–1429.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
