Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2026 Feb 28.
doi: 10.1038/s41431-026-02045-6. Online ahead of print.

A multi-dimensional framework for establishing and managing a genomic newborn screening program

Affiliations

A multi-dimensional framework for establishing and managing a genomic newborn screening program

Elena Schnabel-Besson et al. Eur J Hum Genet. .

Abstract

Newborn screening (NBS) is an effective measure of secondary prevention. The application of genomic sequencing in population-based screening would enable further expansions of the NBS disease panel and a genomic NBS (gNBS). The selection of NBS target diseases is still based on the Wilson and Jungner screening principles from 1968, which are considered incomplete, particularly for an extension towards gNBS. The present work aims to establish a multi-dimensional framework for future gNBS programs. An interdisciplinary expert panel comprising researchers from pediatric and adolescent medicine, human genetics, ethics, medical psychology, law, and patient representatives used a nominal group technique-like multi-stage consensus process to define criteria for gNBS, considering ethical, legal, and social implications, medical aspects, and patient perspectives. Overall, 18 criteria were developed, clustered into four subcategories: I. Clinical criteria (characteristics of the target disease); II. Diagnostic criteria (requirements of the test); III. Therapeutic-interventional criteria (prerequisites of the intervention); IV. Program management criteria (requirements of the program). Subcategories I-III define selection criteria for target diseases, subcategory IV defines criteria for how to establish and manage the program. In conclusion, this multi-dimensional framework serves as a well-balanced basis for developing thoroughly revised and internationally accepted consensus screening criteria.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Ethical approval: For this article no studies with human or animal subjects were performed. All procedures followed were in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

References

    1. Mütze U, Mengler K, Boy N, Gleich F, Opladen T, Garbade SF, et al. How longitudinal observationalstudies can guide screening strategy for rare diseases. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2022;45:889–901. https://doi.org/10.1002/jimd.12508 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dikow N, Ditzen B, Kölker S, Hoffmann GF, Schaaf CP. From newborn screening to genomic medicine:challenges and suggestions on how to incorporate genomic newborn screening in public healthprograms. Med Genet. 2022;34:13–20. https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/medgen-2022-2113/html Available from - PubMed - PMC
    1. Schaaf CP, Kölker S, Hoffmann GF. Genomic newborn screening: Proposal of a two-stage approach. JInherit Metab Dis. 2021;44:518–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/jimd.12381 - DOI
    1. Ceyhan-Birsoy O, Machini K, Lebo MS, Yu TW, Agrawal PB, Parad RB, et al. A curated gene list forreporting results of newborn genomic sequencing. Genet Med. 2017;19:809–18. https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2016.193 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Milko LV, O’Daniel JM, DeCristo DM, Crowley SB, Foreman AKM, Wallace KE, et al. An Age-BasedFramework for Evaluating Genome-Scale Sequencing Results in Newborn Screening. J Pediatr. 2019;209:68–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.12.027 - DOI - PubMed - PMC

LinkOut - more resources