Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1978 Feb;13(2):137-45.
doi: 10.1128/AAC.13.2.137.

SCE-129, antipseudomonal cephalosporin: in vitro and in vivo antibacterial activities

SCE-129, antipseudomonal cephalosporin: in vitro and in vivo antibacterial activities

K Tsuchiya et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1978 Feb.

Abstract

SCE-129 [3-(4-carbamoyl-1-pyridiniomethyl)-7beta-(d-alpha-sulfophenylacetamido)-ceph-3-em-4-carboxylate monosodium salt], a new semisynthetic cephalosporin, shows potent in vitro antibacterial activities against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and some gram-positive bacteria, whereas it shows lower activity against many gram-negative rods. Against clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa this cephalosporin exhibited higher activity than did carbenicillin, and against the strains of Staphylococcus aureus, SCE-129 had similar activity to carbenicillin. Variations in pH, addition of horse serum, and type of growth medium had no significant effects on the activity of the cephalosporin; however, the inoculum size had some effect on the activity. SCE-129 is an effective bactericidal agent against P. aeruginosa and S. aureus. The protective effects of SCE-129 in mice infected with P. aeruginosa and S. aureus were more potent than those of carbenicillin. The protective effects of SCE-129 on Pseudomonas infection in mice varied according to the dosage schedule and the challenge dose. In a multiple dose schedule, a smaller amount of SCE-129 was necessary than that in a single dose schedule. The effects of SCE-129 after subcutaneous or intraperitoneal administration were more potent than were those by intravenous administration. No protective effect was observed by oral administration.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Gen Microbiol. 1960 Feb;22:249-58 - PubMed
    1. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1950 May;74(1):62-4 - PubMed
    1. J Biol Chem. 1955 Dec;217(2):959-66 - PubMed
    1. J Bacteriol. 1964 Dec;88:1790-7 - PubMed
    1. Science. 1964 Feb 21;143(3608):807-8 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources