Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2026 Mar;23(3):e70847.
doi: 10.1111/iwj.70847.

Intent to Treat Analysis of the Primary and Secondary Outcomes for the ODINN Intact Fish Skin Graft for Deep Diabetic Foot Wounds Trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Intent to Treat Analysis of the Primary and Secondary Outcomes for the ODINN Intact Fish Skin Graft for Deep Diabetic Foot Wounds Trial

Dured Dardari et al. Int Wound J. 2026 Mar.

Abstract

There is a significant need for trials that evaluate the treatment of University of Texas (UT) grade 2 and 3 diabetic foot ulcers (bone, joint, or tendon exposed wounds). We undertook a trial looking at the effect of intact fish skin graft (IFSG) on these deep and difficult-to-heal ulcers. 262 patients Intent to Treat (ITT) patients with UT grade 2 and 3 DFUs were randomised to receive intact fish skin graft (IFSG) or a standardised treatment (SOC) that adhered to the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) guidelines. The secondary endpoints that were measured included wound area reduction (WAR), healing rates at 20 and 24 weeks; closure rates by UT grade, perfusion, quality of life, pain reduction and IFSG safety. We report ITT (all randomised) (mITT previosly reported) The (WAR) at 12 weeks was 65.53% for IFSG versus 30.82% for SOC (p = 0.007). UT 2 wounds (60% of total) exhibited a closure rate of 47% versus 23% at 16 weeks for IFSG versus SOC (p = 0.0033). Target wound infections were comparable (39 vs. 37) and major outcomes were comparable during the 24 week period (target-limb amputations 8% vs. 7%). Time-to-heal favoured IFSG (restricted mean to 24 weeks 17.31 vs. 19.37 weeks; KM/log-rank significant; Cox HR 1.59). The in the treatment of deep complex diabetic foot wounds the addition of IFSG significantly improved the number of patients with total wound closure as well as the time to wound closure without increased risk of complications. This improvement in total wound closure and time to wound closure was noted across prior amputation status, quality of perfusion, and UT grade.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Dr John C. Lantis is the director of the scientific advisory Council for Kerecis LLC the maker of intact fish skin graft.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Intent to Treat proportion healed over time.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Time to heal intent to treat analysis.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Wound area reduction over time ITT (LOCF, winsorized means).

References

    1. Dardari D., Piaggesi A., Potier L., et al., “Intact Fish Skin Graft to Treat Deep Diabetic Foot Ulcers,” NEJM Evidence 3, no. 12 (2024), 10.1056/EVIDoa2400171. Epub 2024 Oct 4. Erratum in: NEJM Evid. 2025 Mar;4(3). - DOI - PubMed
    1. IWGDF/IDSA , “Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Diabetes‐Related Foot Infections (IWGDF/IDSA 2023),” Clinical Infectious Diseases 79, no. 1 (2024): 286, 10.1093/cid/ciae287. Erratum for: Clin Infect Dis. 2023 Oct 02:ciad527.Schaper, NC, van Netten, JJ, Apelqvist, J, et al. Practical Guidelines on the Prevention and Management of Diabetes‐Related Foot Disease (IWGDF 2023 update). Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2023:e3657. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Janke T. M., Kozon V., Valiukeviciene S., et al., “Assessing Health‐Related Quality of Life Using the Wound‐QoL‐17 and the Wound‐QoL‐14‐Results of the Cross‐Sectional European HAQOL Study Using Item Response Theory,” International Wound Journal 21, no. 8 (2024): e70009, 10.1111/iwj.70009. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vileikyte L., Peyrot M., Bundy C., et al., “The Development and Validation of a Neuropathy‐ and Foot Ulcer‐Specific Quality of Life Instrument,” Diabetes Care 26, no. 9 (2003): 2549–2555, 10.2337/diacare.26.9.2549. - DOI - PubMed
    1. J. C. Lantis, Ii , Lullove E. J., Liden B., et al., “Final Efficacy and Cost Analysis of a Fish Skin Graft vs Standard of Care in the Management of Chronic Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial,” Wounds 35, no. 4 (2023): 71–79, 10.25270/wnds/22094. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources