Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2026 Mar 6:e20914.
doi: 10.1002/advs.202520914. Online ahead of print.

Profiling Localized Immunomodulation and Drug Biodistribution within a Subcutaneous Vascularized Niche for Cell Transplantation

Affiliations

Profiling Localized Immunomodulation and Drug Biodistribution within a Subcutaneous Vascularized Niche for Cell Transplantation

Jocelyn Nikita Campa-Carranza et al. Adv Sci (Weinh). .

Abstract

Systemic immunosuppression remains essential for preventing allogeneic transplant rejection, but its chronic use causes substantial toxicity. Conceptually, local, site-specific immunomodulation offers a promising alternative, yet comparative mechanistic insight into how immunosuppressants behave when delivered directly to the graft is lacking. Here, we leveraged the Neovascularized Implantable Cell Homing and Encapsulation (NICHE) device, a subcutaneous, vascularized cell-encapsulation platform, as a spatially defined and reproducible model to study local immunomodulation in allogeneic islet transplantation. We systematically profiled the safety, local and systemic immunomodulatory effects, pharmacokinetics, and longitudinal biodistribution of five clinically relevant agents delivered locally at the graft site: CTLA4-Ig, anti-lymphocyte serum, anti-CD40L, anti-CD2, and anti-IL6. Sustained in situ exposure did not impair islet viability or function, and immunosuppressants were confined within the graft, with up to 100-fold lower systemic concentrations. Individual agents produced distinct immune signatures, spanning lymphocyte depletion and shifts in T-cell activation that can guide rational, mechanism-informed combinations for allogeneic cell transplantation. These findings provide a comparative framework for evaluating localized immunosuppression with the potential to transform immunoprotection in cell therapy.

Keywords: cell encapsulation; cell therapy; drug biodistribution; immunomodulation; islet transplantation; localized immunosuppression; pharmacokinetics.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. N. Niclauss, D. Bosco, P. Morel, L. Giovannoni, T. Berney, and G. Parnaud, “Rapamycin Impairs Proliferation of Transplanted Islet Beta Cells,” Transplantation 91 (2011): 714–722, https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0b013e31820c10c8.
    1. E. Zahr, R. D. Molano, A. Pileggi, et al., “Rapamycin Impairs in Vivo Proliferation of Islet Beta‐Cells,” Transplantation 84 (2007): 1576–1583, https://doi.org/10.1097/01.tp.0000296035.48728.28.
    1. M. M. Hafiz, R. N. Faradji, T. Froud, et al., “Immunosuppression and Procedure‐Related Complications in 26 Patients With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Receiving Allogeneic Islet Cell Transplantation,” Transplantation 80 (2005): 1718–1728, https://doi.org/10.1097/01.tp.0000187881.97068.77.
    1. J. R. Chapman, A. C. Webster, and G. Wong, “Cancer in the Transplant Recipient,” Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine 3 (2013): a015677, https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a015677.
    1. J. Zhou, Z. Hu, Q. Zhang, et al., “Spectrum of De Novo Cancers and Predictors in Liver Transplantation: Analysis of the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients Database,” PLoS ONE 11 (2016): 0155179, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155179.