Glioblastoma survival in rural America: a 10-year experience from a quaternary care center
- PMID: 41806077
- PMCID: PMC12975803
- DOI: 10.1007/s11060-026-05501-x
Glioblastoma survival in rural America: a 10-year experience from a quaternary care center
Abstract
Background: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive primary brain tumor with dismal prognosis. Patients residing in rural and Appalachian regions encounter multiple barriers to timely diagnosis and access to multidisciplinary neuro-oncology care, but whether these barriers translate into worse survival remains uncertain. West Virginia (WV), a predominantly rural Appalachian state, is served by a primary academic medical center (WV University Ruby Memorial Hospital) with a dedicated neuro-oncology program. We performed a retrospective analysis of the electronic health record to characterize overall survival and prognostic factors among WV residents diagnosed with GBM.
Methods: Retrospective cohort of 380 adults (≥ 18 years) with pathologically confirmed Isocitrate Dehydrogenase-wildtype (IDH-WT) GBM (2015-2025). Rurality defined by ZIP-code RUCA. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the association between overall survival (OS) and age, sex, treatment, rurality, and O⁶-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status.
Results: Median OS was 12.7 months. Age ≥ 65 was associated with worse survival (15.9 vs. 9.1 months; p < 0.001). Rural and non-rural survival was equivalent (12.5 vs. 12.7 months; p = 0.87). Temozolomide (TMZ) use significantly improved OS (14.0 vs. 6.2 months; p < 0.001). Gross total resection and MGMT promoter methylation were both associated with significantly improved overall survival (p < 0.001 and p = 0.0005, respectively).
Conclusions: In a predominantly rural state served by a primary academic neuro-oncology program, median overall survival for GBM was 12.7 months indicating centralized care eliminates rural-urban survival gaps in GBM.
Keywords: Centralized care; Glioblastoma; Real-world evidence; Rural health disparities; Survival analysis; Temozolomide.
© 2026. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethical approval: This retrospective study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the West Virginia Uinversity Institutional Review Board, which waived the requirement for informed consent due to the retrospective nature of the study. Consent to participate: Not applicable (retrospective study). Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures
References
-
- Ostrom QT, Price M, Ryan K, Cioffi G, Kruchko C, Waite K et al (2024) CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and other central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2017–2021. Neuro Oncol 26(Suppl 4):iv1–iv49. 10.1093/neuonc/noae123 - DOI
-
- Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ, Weller M, Fisher B, Taphoorn MJ et al (2005) Concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ) and radiotherapy (RT) for newly diagnosed glioblastoma: conclusive results of a randomized phase III trial by the Sara Swann Foundation for Neuroscience and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Brain and Radiotherapy Groups. J Clin Oncol 23(16suppl):2. 10.1200/JCO.2005.23.16_suppl.2. (Full trial: Stupp R, Mason, WP, van den Bent MJ et al. (2005) Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 352(10):987–996. 10.1056/NEJMoa043330) - PubMed
-
- Barnholtz-Sloan JS, Ostrom QT, Shetty S, Williams VL, Wilson T, Johnson DR et al (2023) Comparative survival of patients with glioblastoma using real-world data from the US National Cancer Database (NCDB) and SEER program. J Neurooncol 162(2):345–354. 10.1007/s11060-023-04289-5 - DOI
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
