Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2026 Mar 16;18(6):932.
doi: 10.3390/nu18060932.

Alcohol and Substance Use After Bariatric Surgery: Nutritional Risks and Clinical Implications in Long-Term Postoperative Care

Affiliations
Review

Alcohol and Substance Use After Bariatric Surgery: Nutritional Risks and Clinical Implications in Long-Term Postoperative Care

Martín Campuzano-Donoso et al. Nutrients. .

Abstract

Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) has evolved into a highly effective neurohormonal intervention for severe obesity; however, it introduces unique long-term vulnerabilities, particularly regarding alcohol (AUD) and substance use disorders (SUD). This review synthesizes the epidemiological, pharmacokinetic, and neurobiological drivers of postoperative substance misuse. Procedures like Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) radically alter ethanol metabolism, eliminating first-pass metabolism and accelerating gastric emptying, while simultaneously recalibrating reward pathways, creating a "reward gap" that facilitates addiction transfer. These physiological shifts exacerbate critical micronutrient deficiencies (thiamine, B12, iron), increase the risk of post-bariatric hypoglycemia, and correlate with higher rates of liver cirrhosis and suicide. Furthermore, substance use is a primary driver of suboptimal weight loss trajectories and weight regain. Mitigation requires a lifelong, multidisciplinary framework involving preoperative risk stratification, validated screening (e.g., AUDIT-C), and targeted nutritional supplementation to safeguard the long-term metabolic and psychological benefits of MBS.

Keywords: alcohol-related disorders; bariatric surgery; nutritional deficiencies; postoperative care; risk factors; substance-related disorders.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Pathophysiological mechanism of addiction transfer following (MBS). This flowchart illustrates the transition from pre-operative hyperphagia to post-operative alcohol use. Pre-operatively, food activates mesolimbic dopamine (DA) signaling in the ventral tegmental area (VTA) and nucleus accumbens (NAc) as a coping mechanism. Following MBS, anatomical changes and dumping syndrome physically restrict food intake. Simultaneously, profound hormonal shifts occurs: residual ghrelin signaling may amplify reward sensitivity, while exaggerated surges of GLP-1 and PYY contribute to a caloric “reward deficiency” state. This creates a “Reward Gap” where the recalibrated brain seeks hedonic stimulation, but food is no longer a viable option. Consequently, patients may substitute alcohol, which is rapidly absorbed and rewarding, leading to addiction transfer and a heightened risk of Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD). This process is further modulated by genetic factors (e.g., DRD2), psychiatric history, and stress-axis dysregulation. Although this conceptual model depicts a transition from altered food reward to increased vulnerability to alcohol use, the emergence of postoperative alcohol misuse typically occurs with a delay of 1–2 years rather than immediately after surgery. This temporal pattern likely reflects the progressive nature of neurohormonal adaptation, psychosocial adjustment, and relaxation of early postoperative dietary restrictions. Early postoperative phases are characterized by intensive medical monitoring and dietary limitations, whereas later phases involve stabilization of weight loss, evolving reward signaling, and greater behavioral autonomy, which together may unmask susceptibility to substance use. Accordingly, the proposed “reward gap” should be interpreted as a dynamic and evolving vulnerability rather than an immediate substitution phenomenon [57,60,70,76,78,79,84,88,89,90,91].

References

    1. Panichella G., Gentile F., Nannipieri M., Emdin M. The evolving role of metabolic and bariatric surgery in contemporary clinical practice. Eur. J. Prev. Cardiol. 2025:zwaf787. doi: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwaf787. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Phillips B.T., Shikora S.A. The history of metabolic and bariatric surgery: Development of standards for patient safety and efficacy. Metabolism. 2018;79:97–107. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2017.12.010. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wang L., Wang Q., Xiong Y., Shi W., Qi X. Obesity and Its Comorbidities: Current Treatment Options, Emerging Biological Mechanisms, Future Perspectives and Challenges. Diabetes Metab. Syndr. Obes. 2025;18:3427–3445. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S540103. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dönmez Atılgan Z.T., Tok Ö., Göktaş Z. Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease in women with polycystic ovary syndrome and its relation with other concomitant factors. Mediterr. J. Nutr. Metab. 2026;19:50–58. doi: 10.1177/1973798X251377712. - DOI
    1. Donini L.M., Poggiogalle E., Migliaccio S., Aversa A., Pinto A. Body composition in sarcopenic obesity: Systematic review of the literature. Mediterr. J. Nutr. Metab. 2013;6:191–198. doi: 10.3233/s12349-013-0135-1. - DOI

MeSH terms