Similar articles

• Comparative in vivo activities of cefsulodin, sulbenicillin, and gentamicin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

  Kondo M, Tsuchiya K. Kondo M, et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1978 Jul;14(1):151-3. doi: 10.1128/AAC.14.1.151. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1978. PMID: 249623 Free PMC article.
• Bacteriological studies on the combined action of aminoglycoside antibiotics and synthetic penicillins against Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

  Nakazawa S, Nishino T, Otsuki M, Nakao M, Nomura T. Nakazawa S, et al. J Antibiot (Tokyo). 1974 Dec;27(12):989-91. doi: 10.7164/antibiotics.27.989. J Antibiot (Tokyo). 1974. PMID: 4219785 No abstract available.
• Effectiveness of gentamicin and carbenicillin in a rat model against infections with Pseudomonas aeruginosa resistant to gentamicin or gentamicin and carbenicillin.

  Khakoo RA, Kluge RM. Khakoo RA, et al. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1979 Jan;5(1):53-9. doi: 10.1093/jac/5.1.53. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1979. PMID: 104952 No abstract available.
• Gentamicin.

  Cox CE. Cox CE. Med Clin North Am. 1970 Sep;54(5):1305-15. Med Clin North Am. 1970. PMID: 4919154 Review. No abstract available.
• Continuous vs. intermittent administration of antimicrobial agents: tissue penetration and efficacy in vivo.

  Bergeron MG, Beauchamp D, Poirier A, Bastille A. Bergeron MG, et al. Rev Infect Dis. 1981 Jan-Feb;3(1):84-97. doi: 10.1093/clinids/3.1.84. Rev Infect Dis. 1981. PMID: 7013003 Review. No abstract available.