Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1970 Aug;6(2):156-62.
doi: 10.1128/JVI.6.2.156-162.1970.

Factors affecting the sensitivity of different viruses to interferon

Factors affecting the sensitivity of different viruses to interferon

J V Hallum et al. J Virol. 1970 Aug.

Abstract

When the sensitivities to interferon of Newcastle disease virus (NDV) and vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) were compared by the plaque reduction method in chick embryo cell cultures, NDV was found to be 45-fold more resistant than VSV. This difference was exaggerated when a multiple-cycle yield inhibition method was employed. In marked contrast, when the same viruses were tested by a single-cycle yield inhibition method, the difference in sensitivity to interferon of the two viruses was virtually eliminated. Further investigation showed that, in chick embryo cells exposed to interferon, the resistance to NDV decayed more rapidly than resistance to VSV. This finding explained the divergent results obtained with the two viruses when single- or multiple-cycle replication techniques were employed. Experiments carried out with L cells showed that cellular antiviral resistance decayed much more slowly in these cells than in chick embryo cells. Consequently, when measured by the plaque reduction method in L cells, no difference was observed in the sensitivity to interferon of VSV and NDV(pi), a mutant of NDV which replicates efficiently in L cells. A procedure is suggested for determining the relative sensitivities to interferon of different viruses under conditions which minimize the role of decay of antiviral resistance in the host cells.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Nature. 1966 Jul 30;211(5048):541-2 - PubMed
    1. J Bacteriol. 1966 Oct;92(4):1047-50 - PubMed
    1. Science. 1964 Aug 21;145(3634):811-3 - PubMed
    1. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1966 Mar;121(3):819-24 - PubMed
    1. J Virol. 1969 Sep;4(3):244-51 - PubMed

MeSH terms